Plastic Fiber Spinning for Depolymerization Rate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plastic degradation technologies face challenges such as high costs, inefficient sorting, and downgrading of recycled materials, while also struggling to achieve an efficient rate of degradation.

Innovation Solution

The process involves spinning plastic products into fibers before depolymerization, increasing the contact surface area between the plastic and the depolymerizing agent, thereby enhancing the degradation rate. This is particularly effective for plastics like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polylactic acid (PLA).

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If plastic products are directly depolymerized without spinning, then the process is simpler, but the degradation rate is slow and the contact area between plastic and depolymerizing agent is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedegradation rateVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The plastic product is segmented into fine fibers through the spinning process, dividing the bulk material into numerous thin strands. This segmentation dramatically increases the total surface area exposed to the depolymerizing agent, thereby accelerating the degradation rate while maintaining a relatively simple overall process flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions the plastic material from a three-dimensional bulk form to a one-dimensional fiber structure. This dimensional change fundamentally increases the surface-area-to-volume ratio, allowing the depolymerizing agent to access and act upon a much larger portion of the plastic material simultaneously, thus resolving the contradiction between simplicity and degradation rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the contact area between plastic and depolymerizing agent is increased by spinning, then the degradation rate improves, but the process requires additional spinning equipment and steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepolymerization rateVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spinning process serves multiple functions simultaneously: it prepares the plastic material for depolymerization by increasing surface area, it can be integrated with existing extrusion equipment, and it creates a fiber product that may have direct commercial value. This multi-functionality justifies the added equipment by providing both process enhancement and potential product value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The spinning process is performed as a preliminary step before depolymerization, pre-processing the plastic material to optimize its structure for the subsequent degradation reaction. By preparing the material in advance with increased surface area, the actual depolymerization step becomes more efficient, and the overall process benefits from this preparatory action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional mechanical recycling is used, then the process is well-established, but it requires extensive sorting, is costly, and leads to downgrading of recycled materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycling process establishmentVSAvoidrecycling efficiency and quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the mechanical recycling approach (which relies on physical sorting, melting, and remolding) with a chemical/biological depolymerization system. Instead of mechanically processing the plastic, enzymes or chemical agents break down the polymer chains at the molecular level, eliminating the need for extensive sorting and avoiding the downgrading problem inherent in mechanical recycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of the recycling approach from mechanical processing to chemical/biological degradation. By altering the mechanism from physical to chemical, the process achieves higher efficiency and quality recovery of plastic materials, transforming them back to monomers or simple compounds that can be reused without quality loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If enzymatic depolymerization is applied directly to bulk plastic, then the process is simpler, but the rate of degradation is insufficient for practical applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddegradation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The bulk plastic is segmented into fine fibers through spinning, creating numerous thin strands with high surface area. This segmentation allows enzymatic depolymerization to occur simultaneously across many more sites, dramatically accelerating the degradation rate while keeping the enzymatic process itself simple and unchanged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transition from bulk three-dimensional plastic to one-dimensional fibers creates a geometric transformation that exponentially increases the surface area available for enzymatic attack. This dimensional change enables practical degradation rates without complicating the enzymatic reaction conditions or procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly increases the depolymerization rate of plastics, reduces the amount of depolymerizing agent required, and shortens the degradation time compared to traditional methods, while also enabling the recovery of valuable monomers and oligomers for reuse.

Implementation Method 1

a step of spinning a plastic product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Implementation Method 2

depolymerizing at least one polymer of said spun plastic product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

contacting said fibers with a biological depolymerizing agent which is a depolymerase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzyme: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentEP3838976B1Process for degrading plastic products
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 CARBIOS
  • EP3838976B1 patent drawing
  • EP3838976B1 patent drawing
  • EP3838976B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for degrading a plastic product comprising at least one polymer, the process comprising submitting the plastic product to a spinning step to obtain fibers of said plastic product; and depolymerizing at least one polymer of said fibers.