Reinforced Plastic Gear Rim Layout to Prevent Sinks and Voids

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Molded plastic gears face challenges with resin shrinkage leading to voids and sinks, particularly in thicker regions, which compromises strength and accuracy, making it difficult to manufacture large gears with sufficient tooth depth.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a ring-shaped outer rim with tooth portions and reinforcing ribs spaced by thinning portions, where the ribs are positioned at tooth grooves, enhancing strength and accuracy without increasing rim thickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the rim thickness is increased to ensure gear strength, then the gear strength is improved, but voids and sinks occur due to resin shrinkage in thicker regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegear strengthVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The rim is segmented into multiple regions with different thicknesses by providing reinforcing ribs that extend from the inner circumferential surface to the outer circumferential surface. The rim thickness varies between regions adjacent to tooth portions and regions adjacent to tooth grooves, allowing optimized strength and precision without uniform thickness increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different rim thicknesses are provided at different locations: thicker regions adjacent to tooth portions for strength, and thinner regions adjacent to tooth grooves to prevent voids and sinks. This local variation in quality resolves the contradiction between overall strength and manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the tooth depth is increased to increase tooth size, then the gear strength is improved, but the rim thickness must be increased which causes voids and sinks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooth strengthVSAvoidmoldability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rim is divided into multiple thickness regions through reinforcing ribs, allowing large tooth depth while maintaining manageable rim thickness in specific areas. This segmentation enables large tooth size without uniformly increasing the entire rim thickness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rim thickness is locally optimized: thicker where needed for tooth support and thinner where it would cause manufacturing defects. This allows large tooth depth to be achieved without the moldability issues that would result from uniform rim thickness increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the rim thickness is increased to satisfy strength specifications, then the gear strength is improved, but the wall thickness becomes large causing sinks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverim strengthVSAvoidsurface flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The rim is segmented into multiple thickness zones using reinforcing ribs, creating a non-uniform thickness distribution. This allows strength to be maintained in critical areas while avoiding excessive thickness that would cause sinks in other areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different rim thicknesses are provided at different locations: thicker regions adjacent to tooth portions for strength, and thinner regions adjacent to tooth grooves to prevent sinks. This local variation resolves the contradiction between strength and surface flatness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11592099B2Gear
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 ENPLAS CORP
  • US11592099B2 patent drawing
  • US11592099B2 patent drawing
  • US11592099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A gear includes: an outer circumferential rim provided integrally with a plurality of tooth portions disposed side-by-side in a circumferential direction on an outer circumferential surface; and a plurality of reinforcing ribs disposed inside the outer circumferential rim to be spaced from each other in the circumferential direction by thinning portions, wherein a position where each of the plurality of reinforcing ribs and the outer circumferential rim are joined corresponds, in the circumferential direction, to a position of a tooth groove between the plurality of tooth portions.