Plastic Headrest Frame with Flexible Support Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional headrests for vehicles are costly and lack optimal support and safety features, particularly in the event of a rear-end collision, due to their reliance on foamed materials and complex manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

A headrest body designed with a frame and flexible support elements made from plastic materials, such as thermoplastic or fiber composite materials, which provides a concave support surface without foamed materials, enhancing both comfort and safety by reducing head movement during collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If foamed materials are used for cushioning in headrests, then comfort is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the foamed material layer from the headrest structure, extracting the problematic element that caused manufacturing complexity while retaining the essential cushioning function through alternative means (the plastic material itself provides sufficient support without requiring separate foam layers)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the structural frame and cushioning function into a single integrated plastic component. The thermoplastic or thermosetting plastic material serves both structural and comfort functions, eliminating the need for separate foam materials and reducing manufacturing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If foamed materials are used for cushioning in headrests, then comfort is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive thermoplastic or thermosetting plastic materials that can be mass-produced through injection molding or compression molding. These materials provide adequate comfort for the intended service life of the headrest while being significantly cheaper than traditional foam materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters by using plastics with specific mechanical properties (flexibility, density, elasticity) that provide comfort equivalent to or better than foam. The material parameters are optimized through formulation and processing conditions to achieve the desired comfort at lower cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If conventional headrest design with padding is used, then comfort is provided, but head movement during collisions is not sufficiently minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidsafety in collision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the headrest. The plastic material is formulated with specific local characteristics - firmer in areas requiring head stabilization during collision, and sufficiently flexible in contact areas for comfort. This spatial variation in material quality addresses both comfort and safety requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite plastic formulations or multi-layer plastic structures that combine materials with different mechanical properties. This allows the headrest to provide comfort through flexible contact surfaces while maintaining structural rigidity for collision safety, achieving both comfort and protective function in a single material system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a cost-effective, ergonomic, and safer headrest design that limits head impact in collisions, while maintaining comfort through reduced padding and improved structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

The headrest body is formed by injection molding a material free from foamed plastic materials or by multi-component injection molding from a number of plastic materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInjection molding: 3D Printing

Implementation Method 2

a headrest body (1) designed as at least one frame (1.1) with one or more flexible support elements (1.4) lying on the inside and forming a support surface (1.3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

The headrest body is made of an impact-resistant elastoplastic or thermoplastic material, for example a thermoplastic material, in particular polypropylene, urethane, polyurethane, polyethylene or polycarbonate-acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PC-ABS)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact resistance: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentEP3317143B1Headrest body and headrest
Publication Date: 2022.06.22 ADIENT US LLC
  • EP3317143B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3317143B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3317143B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

The invention relates to a headrest body (1) for a headrest (3), formed as at least one frame (1.1) having one or more supporting elements (1.4) located on the inside and forming a supporting surface (1.3), and formed by primary forming from a plastics material, in particular a material free of foam materials, or a composite material.