Plastic Helical Spring Design for Corrosion Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional helical springs made of spring steel are not suitable for applications requiring resistance to chemical corrosion, non-magnetism, low thermal and electrical conductivity, and a high strength-to-weight ratio, and the use of plastic springs faces challenges in achieving sufficient load-bearing capability and strength due to material limitations and manufacturing difficulties such as kinks and knit lines.

Innovation Solution

A helical spring design featuring end coils with gradual transition coils and a trapezoidal cross-section, along with a specialized mold design allowing for injection molding with minimal stress points and kinks, utilizing high-performance thermoplastic materials like Ultem resin for enhanced strength and recyclability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If spring steel is used to provide high load bearing capability, then strength is improved, but corrosion resistance and recyclability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capabilityVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameter from metal to plastic, specifically using high-performance thermoplastics with glass fiber reinforcement. This material substitution maintains load bearing capability while achieving corrosion resistance and recyclability. The plastic material parameters (molecular structure, fiber reinforcement) are optimized to match the mechanical properties previously only available from spring steel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If plastic material is used to achieve corrosion resistance and recyclability, then corrosion resistance is improved, but load bearing capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidload bearing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses composite plastic materials consisting of thermoplastic matrix combined with glass fiber reinforcement. This composite structure provides both the corrosion resistance of plastic and the enhanced strength needed for load bearing applications. The glass fibers act as reinforcement to compensate for the inherently lower strength of pure plastic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes plastic material parameters by selecting high-performance thermoplastics and adjusting molecular weight, cross-linking density, and fiber reinforcement content. These parameter changes enable plastic materials to achieve load bearing capabilities previously only attainable with metal spring steel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional multi-section mold design is used for injection molding, then ease of manufacture is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to kinks and knit lines

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of injection moldingVSAvoidsurface smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the mold into multiple sections (first mold section, second mold section, third mold section) with specific functional assignments. The first mold section forms the helical spring structure, while the second and third sections form the end coils. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function, eliminating the kinks and knit lines that occur when all sections attempt to form the helix simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies different mold section designs to different parts of the spring. The main body of the spring is formed by the first mold section with its specific helical cavity, while the end coils are formed by separate second and third mold sections. This local differentiation of mold quality and design ensures that each region of the spring receives the appropriate forming conditions for its specific geometric requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If conventional mold design with four similar sections is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to undercuts impeding mold withdrawal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemold design simplicityVSAvoidhelical shape accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the mold into distinct sections with specialized functions: the first mold section for the helical body, and separate second and third mold sections for the end coils. This segmentation eliminates the undercut problems that plague conventional four-section designs, as each section is designed to withdraw without interference from the helical geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention resolves the withdrawal problem by separating the end coil formation into distinct dimensional steps. The second and third mold sections form the end coils at different positions and orientations, allowing them to be released from the helical spring body without the sections needing to withdraw through the tight helical undercuts that trap conventional multi-section molds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a high strength-to-weight ratio, minimizes side thrust, and reduces stress points, enabling the production of lightweight, corrosion-resistant, and non-magnetic plastic helical springs with improved load-bearing capacity and fatigue life.

Implementation Method 1

it is difficult to create practical mold designs for the manufacture of helical springs from plastic material. Conventional mold tool designs have four relatively similar mold sections that come together to form the mold cavity equally for each circular quadrant of the spring. Molten plastic material is injected into the mold cavity formed by the mold sections through a center or core pin around which the four mold sections are situated. After cooling, the mold sections pull apart and the spring is released from the mold.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInjection molding:

Implementation Method 2

Molten plastic material is injected into the mold cavity formed by the mold sections through a center or core pin around which the four mold sections are situated. After cooling, the mold sections pull apart and the spring is released from the mold.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS8939438B2Plastic spring and method and apparatus for making the same
Publication Date: 2015.01.27 LEE SPRING CO LLC
  • US8939438B2 patent drawing
  • US8939438B2 patent drawing
  • US8939438B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention provides a helical spring formed of plastic material, comprising a pair of end coils situated at respective ends of said helical spring; at least one full pitch active coil between said pair of end coils; a pair of transition coils, each transition coil interconnecting an end of a respective end coil to an end of a respective proximate full pitch active coil, and having a varying pitch.