Plastic Identification Using Multi-Spectroscopy and FLZA

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying and separating plastics, particularly in recycling, face challenges such as inability to accurately distinguish chemically similar plastics, inefficiency in large-scale applications, and the need for costly markers, with existing spectroscopic techniques like IR and Raman spectroscopy having limitations in detecting black plastics and requiring markers.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing a laser to irradiate plastic samples with light of specific wavelengths, combining UV/VIS, fluorescence, Raman, and absorption spectroscopy, along with fluorescence light decay time analysis (FLZA) to achieve reliable identification of substances and additives, even in granulate form, enabling differentiation of chemically similar materials and additives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If Raman spectroscopy is used to identify plastics, then identification capability is achieved, but spectra intensities are very low making it unsuitable for large-scale applications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification capabilityVSAvoidlarge-scale application capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple spectroscopic methods (UV/VIS spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and absorption spectroscopy) into a single identification system. This merging allows the system to leverage the strengths of each method while compensating for their individual weaknesses, enabling both accurate identification and high-speed processing suitable for large-scale recycling applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If IR spectroscopy is used to separate plastics by type, then separation capability is achieved, but black-colored plastics cannot be detected selectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation capabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy for black plastics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal identification system that can detect all plastic types regardless of color. By combining multiple spectroscopic methods that respond differently to various materials, the system achieves multi-functionality where each method compensates for the others' limitations, particularly enabling detection of black plastics that are invisible to IR spectroscopy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If markers are used for plastic identification, then identification accuracy is improved, but cost and practicality are significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidcost and practicality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables plastics to identify themselves through their inherent spectroscopic properties without requiring external markers. The combined spectroscopic system analyzes the natural optical responses of different plastic materials, eliminating the need for costly and impractical marker systems while maintaining high identification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If known spectroscopic methods are used for plastic detection, then detection capability is achieved, but accuracy for chemically similar plastics is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidaccuracy for chemically similar plastics
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple spectroscopic techniques that provide complementary information about plastic materials. By analyzing data from UV/VIS, fluorescence, Raman, and absorption spectroscopy simultaneously, the system creates a comprehensive spectral fingerprint that can reliably distinguish between chemically similar plastics that any single method would fail to differentiate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides high reliability in identifying substances and additives, allowing for accurate separation of plastics, including those with flame retardants, and can handle large quantities, making it suitable for recycling applications.

Implementation Method 1

a light source, in particular in the form of a laser, for irradiating a sample of the material with light of at least one wavelength, a detector for detecting the light re-emitted and/or transmitted by the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight re-emission: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 2

for analyzing the detected light by way of: a) UV/VIS spectroscopy, and/or b) fluorescence spectroscopy, and/or c) Raman spectroscopy, and/or d) absorption spectroscopy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption spectroscopy: Absorption Spectroscopy

Implementation Method 3

b) fluorescence spectroscopy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS12123832B2Apparatus for identifying substances
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 KRIEG GUNTHER
  • US12123832B2 patent drawing
  • US12123832B2 patent drawing
  • US12123832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and methods for identifying substances in a material include at least one light source configured to irradiate a sample of the material with light of at least one wavelength. A detector is configured to detect light re-emitted or transmitted by the sample. An analysis device analyzes the detected light by UV/VIS spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, or absorption spectroscopy, and generates a first identification result for at least one substance of the sample. Further, the analysis device generates a second identification result in response to the first identification result being an ambiguous identification result. The second identification result may be generated by fluorescence light decay time analysis (FLZA). At least one substance is at least partially identified based on the first identification result or based on the first and second identification results.