Plastic Muffler Holder Reduces Weight and Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing muffler holding devices for two-wheeled vehicles, such as motorcycles, are often expensive and inflexible, requiring metallic frame parts that are not necessary for stability and heat resistance.

Innovation Solution

A plastic holder part, potentially made from fiber-reinforced plastic, is designed to replace metallic frame parts, providing stability, heat resistance, and additional functions like aerodynamic optimization, shock absorption, and integrated fastening and protective features, which can be manufactured cost-effectively and in various shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a metallic frame part is used to hold the muffler, then structural strength and heat resistance are ensured, but manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs fiber-reinforced plastic (composite material) to replace traditional metallic frame parts for holding the muffler. The fiber reinforcement provides the necessary structural strength and heat resistance, while the plastic matrix allows for integrated manufacturing of multiple functions, thereby reducing device complexity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic holder part is designed to perform multiple functions: it holds the muffler, provides structural support, offers heat resistance, and can be integrated with aerodynamic fairings. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate metallic frame parts, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining necessary strength properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Force

If a metallic frame part is used to hold the muffler, then load-bearing capacity is ensured, but manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the muffler holder function with the aerodynamic fairing into a single integrated plastic component. The holder part is formed as an integral part of the fairing structure, eliminating separate metallic frame parts and reducing assembly complexity while maintaining load-bearing capacity through optimized plastic reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Fiber-reinforced plastic provides the necessary load-bearing capacity to replace metallic frame parts. The composite material structure maintains structural integrity and force transmission capabilities while allowing for simpler, more integrated manufacturing and assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If a plastic holder part is used, then manufacturing cost and flexibility are reduced/improved, but heat resistance and structural stability must be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidheat resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses fiber-reinforced plastic where the plastic matrix provides ease of manufacture and cost-effectiveness, while the fiber reinforcement (such as glass or carbon fibers) provides the necessary heat resistance and structural stability. This composite approach allows molding of complex shapes at low cost while meeting thermal and mechanical requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the physical and chemical parameters of the plastic material by adding fiber reinforcement and selecting high-temperature resistant plastic matrices. These parameter changes enable the plastic holder to withstand exhaust heat while maintaining manufacturing advantages over metal parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Weight of moving object

If a plastic holder part is used, then weight is reduced, but structural strength and stability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fiber-reinforced plastic structure provides high strength-to-weight ratio. The fibers provide structural strength and stiffness, while the plastic matrix binds them together and distributes loads, achieving weight reduction compared to metal parts while maintaining necessary structural strength for holding the muffler.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The plastic holder part reduces component count, weight, and assembly complexity while offering secure muffler retention, improved aerodynamics, and enhanced impact protection, making it a cost-effective and flexible alternative to traditional metallic solutions.

Implementation Method 1

the holder part made from plastic can be designed in such a way that, in the case of an impact, it provides a crumple zone, in order to dampen the impact by way of energy conversion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10494980B2Device for accommodating a muffler for a two-wheel vehicle
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US10494980B2 patent drawing
  • US10494980B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for accommodating a muffler for a two-wheel vehicle, in particular a motorcycle, includes a holder part that can be fastened to a structural component of the two-wheel vehicle. The holder part retains the muffler. A plastic part is used as the holder part.