Plastic Pressure Container Finish Undercut Sealing Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing plastic pressure containers face challenges in withstanding high internal pressures and providing effective sealing due to their material limitations and design considerations, which lead to issues like rust and surface scratching, and inadequate sealing between the container finish and closure assembly.

Innovation Solution

A plastic pressure container design featuring a finish portion with both inner and outer undercuts that securely engage the closure assembly through crimping, providing multiple points of contact and enhanced sealing, and fabricated from materials like polyethylene terephthalate or other polyester-based polymers, capable of withstanding pressures up to 160 psi.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If metal containers are used for pressure containers, then they can withstand high internal pressures, but they tend to rust over time and scratch surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure withstanding capabilityVSAvoidrust and surface scratching
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to plastic (specifically high-density polyethylene or similar plastics), fundamentally altering the chemical composition to eliminate rust and scratching properties while maintaining pressure containment capability through appropriate plastic material selection and design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite construction by combining the plastic container body with a separate closure assembly that includes its own sealing mechanisms and structural elements, creating a hybrid system that leverages the corrosion resistance of plastic while providing robust sealing through the integrated closure design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If plastic material is used for pressure containers, then rust and surface scratching are prevented, but the material may not withstand high internal pressures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverust and surface scratching resistanceVSAvoidpressure withstanding capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selects specific plastic materials with appropriate mechanical properties (such as high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, or other pressure-resistant plastics) and adjusts structural parameters including wall thickness, reinforcement ribs, and overall geometry to achieve the necessary pressure withstanding capability while maintaining the inherent corrosion resistance of plastic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a cylindrical container shape with carefully designed curvature radii at transitions and joints, which distributes stress more evenly throughout the structure and prevents stress concentration points that would otherwise limit the pressure withstanding capability of plastic material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Ease of manufacture

If a simple finish portion design is used, then manufacturing is easier, but effective sealing between the finish and closure assembly cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinish portion fabricationVSAvoidsealing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates pre-formed sealing surfaces, undercuts, and engagement features directly into the mold during finish portion fabrication. These features are created in advance as integral parts of the molding process, ensuring proper sealing geometry is established before the closure assembly is applied, thereby guaranteeing effective sealing while maintaining manufacturing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a sealing member (such as a gasket, O-ring, or integral sealing flange) that acts as an intermediary element between the finish portion and closure assembly. This sealing member fills minor dimensional variations and creates a reliable seal, mediating the interface between the two components to ensure leak-proof performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Strength

If a closure assembly mounting system is designed for high pressure, then pressure containment is improved, but the mounting structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure containmentVSAvoidmounting structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into the closure assembly structure: the closure body integrates the sealing surface, the crimping engagement features, and the external threading or attachment mechanisms. By merging these elements into a single integrated component rather than separate parts, the design achieves robust pressure containment while minimizing overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10259644B2Structure and method of sealing a closure assembly onto the neck finish of a plastic pressure container
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 GRAHAM PACKAGING CO LP
  • US10259644B2 patent drawing
  • US10259644B2 patent drawing
  • US10259644B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plastic pressure container including a main body portion and a finish portion defining a mouth, the finish portion has an inner surface, an outer surface and an upper rim proximate the mouth. The inner surface has an inner undercut defined therein proximate the upper rim, and the inner undercut has a curved shape in cross-section. The outer surface has an outer undercut defined therein proximate the upper rim, and the outer undercut has a polygonal shape in cross-section. The inner undercut defines a first depth relative to an inner diameter D2 proximate the mouth and the outer undercut defines a second depth relative to an outer diameter D3 proximate the mouth. The second depth is different than the first depth.