Plastic Waste Pyrolysis Gas Integration for Cracker Separation Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Recycling non-biodegradable waste materials is economically challenging due to the need for different recycling processes and expensive physical sorting, and large-scale facilities struggle to efficiently process mixed waste streams.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pyrolysis and partial oxidation of recycled waste plastics to produce syngas, followed by integration with a cracker facility for enhanced separation and production of olefin products, utilizing a recycle content pyrolysis gas (r-pyrolysis gas) to improve separation efficiency in the cracker facility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If physical sorting of waste materials is performed to achieve pure, single-composition waste volumes, then recycling purity is improved, but processing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycling purityVSAvoidprocessing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of waste processing from physical separation based on material composition to chemical conversion that accepts mixed compositions. By converting diverse waste plastics into a uniform syngas intermediate through pyrolysis and gasification, the system achieves high-purity recycled products without requiring expensive physical sorting infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces syngas as an intermediary substance that decouples the complexity of mixed waste input from the purity requirements of recycled product output. Mixed waste plastics are converted to syngas, which then serves as a standardized feedstock for producing pure recycled plastics, effectively mediating between heterogeneous inputs and homogeneous outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If different recycling processes are used for different types of waste materials, then recycling effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecycling effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a universal processing system where a single integrated facility can handle multiple types of waste plastics (polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, etc.) through the same pyrolysis-gasification-cracking process train. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate specialized facilities for different plastic types, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining recycling effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention segments the recycling process into distinct functional units (pyrolysis reactor, gasifier, cracker, separation systems) that can process different waste types in modular fashion. Each unit performs a specific function, allowing the system to handle diverse waste materials through a standardized sequence of operations rather than requiring entirely different process lines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If large-scale production facilities process mixed waste streams, then processing capacity is improved, but separation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces mechanical separation systems with chemical conversion processes. Instead of using complex mechanical sorting equipment to separate mixed plastics by type, the system uses pyrolysis and gasification to chemically convert all plastic types into syngas, which is then cracked into uniform olefin products. This substitution maintains high processing capacity while achieving consistent product quality regardless of input mixture complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the separation efficiency of olefin products in the cracker facility, allowing for the effective processing of mixed waste streams and reducing the environmental impact by utilizing recycled materials.

Implementation Method 1

pyrolyzing at least a portion of the pyrolysis feed to thereby form a pyrolysis effluent comprising a pyrolysis gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

feeding at least a portion of the pyrolysis gas into a partial oxidation gasifier

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial oxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS20250230364A1Chemical recycling of plastic-derived streams to a cracker separation zone with enhanced separation efficiency
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 EXXONMOBIL PRODUCT SOLUTIONS CO
  • US20250230364A1 patent drawing
  • US20250230364A1 patent drawing
  • US20250230364A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for the conversion of waste plastics into various useful downstream recycle-content products. More particularly, the present system and method involves integrating a pyrolysis facility with a cracker facility by introducing at least a stream of r-pyrolysis gas into the cracker facility. In the cracker facility, the r-pyrolysis gas may be separated to form one or more recycle content products, and can enhance the operation of the facility.