Plastic Scintillator Neutron Detection via Coincidence Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current neutron measurement stations face high costs due to the prohibitively expensive helium-3 proportional counters, and alternative detectors like boron trifluoride and organic scintillators are either toxic, flammable, or inefficient for high counting rates, making them unsuitable for characterizing nuclear materials effectively.

Innovation Solution

A radiation detection method using polyvinyl-toluene (PVT) or polystyrene plastic scintillators not doped with neutron absorbers, arranged around a radiation source, which detects pulse coincidences of multiplicity 2 or higher and employs time difference windows to differentiate between neutron and gamma radiation signals, thereby isolating useful fission coincidences from parasitic ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If helium-3 proportional counters are used for neutron detection, then detection efficiency for thermalized neutrons is improved, but cost increases prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection efficiencyVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive helium-3 counters with cheaper plastic scintillator detectors that can be used in large numbers without significant degradation, effectively using inexpensive substitute components to achieve the same detection function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from direct thermal neutron counting (helium-3) to fast neutron detection through time-correlated coincidence counting, allowing the use of different detector materials with different properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If boron trifluoride meters are used as alternative detectors, then cost is reduced, but detection efficiency is approximately 2 times lower than helium-3 counters

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoiddetection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple low-efficiency detectors in a coincidence counting arrangement, where the joint detection of two or more neutrons from fission events provides superior measurement capability that compensates for individual detector inefficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic scintillator detectors serve multiple functions: detecting fast neutrons directly, providing timing information for coincidence counting, and enabling gamma-ray rejection through pulse shape discrimination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If organic scintillators are used for neutron detection, then cost and availability are improved, but ability to discriminate neutrons from gamma radiation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidneutron-gamma discrimination
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary time-correlation analysis by recording arrival times of all detected particles and subsequently identifying coincidence events through computational processing, separating neutron signals from gamma background before final analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces time correlation as an intermediary parameter that mediates between the raw detector signals and the final neutron identification, using temporal patterns to distinguish neutron coincidences from gamma radiation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If multiple detectors are arranged around radiation source for coincidence detection, then detection capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection system into independent modular detector units, each processing signals locally, with results combined through simple coincidence logic, allowing scalable configuration without proportional increase in overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces the cost and improves the signal/noise ratio by accurately distinguishing between fission and parasitic coincidences, enabling efficient detection of neutrons from fission events while minimizing false positives from gamma radiation and crosstalk interactions.

Implementation Method 1

A radiation detection method using polyvinyl-toluene (PVT) or polystyrene plastic scintillators

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

each detector comprising a photomultiplier associated with an organic plastic scintillator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3835831B1Method for radiation detection comprising neutron-gamma discrimination and corresponding system
Publication Date: 2022.03.30 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP3835831B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3835831B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3835831B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A method for detecting radiation, comprising the steps, implemented by a computer connected to N detectors (N≥3) arranged around a radiation source, each comprising a photomultiplier of: detection, within a time window, of coincidences of pulses of multiplicity of order ≥2 between the electrical signals provided by the photomultipliers; determination of a first number of pulse coincidences for a first time gap window including the pairs (γ, n) and (n, n), and excluding pairs (γ, γ); determination of a second number of pulse coincidences for a second time gap window chosen to include pairs (n, n) and excluding pairs (γ, γ) and (γ, n); counting the coincidences located in a time zone delimited by the first and second time gap windows.