Plastic Spacer With Embedded Mesh For Multi-Pane Glazing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spacers for multi-pane insulating glazing lack sufficient strength and exhibit high thermal conductivity, with existing reinforcement methods either failing to provide adequate stability or leading to moisture issues due to detachment of materials during thermal expansion.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a metal or non-metal mesh within the plastic spacer body during the extrusion process, which provides reinforcement without the detachment issues seen with metal foils and allows for reduced wall thickness without compromising strength, thereby reducing thermal conductivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the wall thickness of the spacer main body is reduced to lower thermal conductivity, then the insulating performance is improved, but the mechanical strength and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal conductivityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by embedding a metal mesh (aluminum, steel, or stainless steel) within the plastic matrix of the spacer main body. This creates a composite structure where the metal mesh provides high mechanical strength and stiffness, enabling the use of thinner plastic walls while maintaining structural integrity. The metal mesh acts as a reinforcement skeleton that carries mechanical loads, allowing the plastic walls to be made thinner for reduced thermal conductivity without compromising strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If glass fibers are admixed with the plastics material for reinforcement, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the material becomes very brittle and the wall thickness cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidbrittleness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces fiber-reinforced plastic composites with a metal mesh-reinforced plastic composite. The metal mesh provides reinforcement while maintaining the ductility and flexibility of the plastic matrix, avoiding the brittleness issue associated with glass fiber admixture. The mesh structure distributes stresses evenly throughout the plastic material, preventing stress concentration points that would lead to brittle failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If a metal foil is embedded in the main body for reinforcement, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the plastic becomes detached from the metal foil during thermal expansion causing moisture problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidmoisture resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a metal mesh with an open porous structure rather than a solid metal foil. This mesh structure allows the plastic material to interpenetrate and mechanically interlock with the metal wires, creating a unified composite structure that prevents detachment during thermal expansion. The open structure of the mesh accommodates dimensional changes of both the metal and plastic components, maintaining intimate contact and preventing moisture ingress pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Strength

If fibers are added to the plastic material for reinforcement, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the heat transfer of the spacer is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidheat transfer
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the reinforcement function in a localized metal mesh structure rather than distributing fibers throughout the entire plastic volume. The metal mesh is positioned strategically within the plastic matrix to provide reinforcement only where structurally necessary, while leaving the surrounding plastic material intact to maintain its low thermal conductivity properties. This localized reinforcement approach avoids the widespread heat conduction pathways that would be created by distributed fiber networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The embedded mesh enhances the spacer's stability and reduces thermal conductivity, preventing bending and moisture problems while allowing for thinner profiles without increasing heat transfer, thus improving insulating properties.

Implementation Method 1

a metal mesh, which is embedded in the main body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical reinforcement:

Implementation Method 2

A reduced wall thickness has the result that the thermal conductivity of the main body is reduced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 3

the outer face and an inner face, which respectively connect the two abutment surfaces, the main body being made of plastic and having at least one metal layer on the outer face

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentUS9012000B2Spacer
Publication Date: 2015.04.21 S & T COMPONENTS
  • US9012000B2 patent drawing
  • US9012000B2 patent drawing
  • US9012000B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spacer for multi-pane insulating glazing, comprising a main body, which has mutually parallel abutment surfaces for panes, and an outer face and an inner face, which respectively connect the two abutment surfaces, the main body being made of plastic and having at least one metal layer on the outer face. The spacer also has a metal or a non-metal mesh, which is embedded in the main body.