Plastic Stabilizer Guiding Mechanism for Preform Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing molding units for manufacturing 'HR'-type containers face issues with preform positioning and material durability due to the use of metal stabilizers, which can cause deterioration of the preform neck and rim, especially under high thermal conditions, and the need for precise guiding mechanisms that restrict material selection.

Innovation Solution

A molding unit with a stabilizer made of plastic material, guided axially by a radial guide means, and actuated by a linear motor, allowing for thermal expansion and reduced weight, enabling smoother and faster operation with reduced risk of damage to the preform neck.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a metal stabilizer is used to ensure correct positioning of the preform, then positioning reliability is improved, but the preform neck and rim deteriorate due to metal abrasion and thermal damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreform positioning reliabilityVSAvoidpreform neck and rim deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer is made from a plastic material that can be replaced easily and at low cost. Instead of using a durable metal stabilizer that causes damage, a disposable or frequently replaceable plastic stabilizer is used to prevent preform deterioration while maintaining positioning functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The material of the stabilizer is changed from metal to plastic, fundamentally altering its physical and chemical properties. This parameter change eliminates the abrasion and thermal damage issues associated with metal while maintaining the stabilizer's positioning function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If a guiding mechanism is implemented to ensure precise stabilizer positioning, then positioning precision is improved, but the device complexity increases and material selection is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilizer positioning precisionVSAvoidguiding mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer's own geometry and material properties provide the necessary guiding and positioning functions. The stabilizer is designed with specific geometric features that enable self-guiding during insertion into the preform neck, eliminating the need for separate complex guiding mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic material of the stabilizer allows for thermal expansion and flexibility that inherently aids positioning. The material parameters are selected to provide both precision through controlled deformation and simplicity by eliminating rigid guiding structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If a metal stabilizer is used under high thermal conditions, then structural strength is maintained, but the preform damage risk increases due to thermal conduction and material hardness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilizer structural strengthVSAvoidpreform damage from thermal and mechanical stress
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer material is changed from metal to a specialized plastic that maintains adequate structural strength while having low thermal conductivity and appropriate hardness. This parameter change allows the stabilizer to function under thermal conditions without transferring excessive heat or causing mechanical damage to the preform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The stabilizer is made from a composite or specially formulated plastic material that combines multiple properties: sufficient structural strength, low thermal conductivity, and controlled hardness. This composite approach allows optimization of multiple parameters simultaneously to prevent preform damage while maintaining stabilizer functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of a plastic stabilizer and linear motor improves manufacturing rates, reduces material abrasion, and minimizes the risk of preform damage, enabling precise control and increased container production efficiency while maintaining reliability under thermal conditions.

Implementation Method 1

each molding impression being able to be heated by heating means associated with said mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

allowing for thermal expansion and reduced weight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Data Source

PatentUS10071520B2Molding unit for manufacturing containers from preforms made of plastic material
Publication Date: 2018.09.11 SIDEL PARTICIPATIONS SAS
  • US10071520B2 patent drawing
  • US10071520B2 patent drawing
  • US10071520B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A molding unit (10) for manufacturing preforms (100) made of plastics material, includes at least one “HR”-type mold (10), a nozzle (14) including at least a nozzle body (28) and a nozzle orifice (30) incorporating a preform (100) stabilizer (34) that forms with a tubular member (40) a mobile assembly that is able to slide axially relative to the nozzle orifice (30) between at least a top position and a bottom position, wherein the tubular member (40) is guided so as to slide axially with respect to the nozzle body (28) by at least one guiding element (46) which is interposed radially between the nozzle body (28) and the tubular inlet member (40), and the stabilizer (34), fixed to the tubular member (40), is guided with respect to the nozzle body (28) only by way of the at least one guiding element (46).