Plastic Surgery Risk Scoring for Real-Time Complication Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a real-time, evidence-based system for predicting and preventing complications in plastic surgery, as existing guidelines are not patient-specific and often outdated, leading to inefficiencies in risk assessment and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A multifactorial risk prediction system using a computing platform that assesses patient-specific factors like BMI, Caprini Score, and smoking habits to classify patients into low, moderate, or high-risk categories, providing personalized recommendations and automating the risk assessment process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If expert consensus guidelines are used for risk assessment, then a standardized approach is provided, but the system cannot predict complications in real-time and does not account for individual patient variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidpatient-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms static expert consensus guidelines into a dynamic, real-time predictive model that continuously adapts to individual patient characteristics. The machine learning algorithm processes multiple patient-specific variables (age, BMI, comorbidities, surgical factors) to generate personalized risk predictions, enabling the system to adjust recommendations based on each patient's unique profile rather than applying fixed thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates multiple varying parameters including age, BMI, comorbidities, smoking status, and surgical-specific factors to create a comprehensive risk assessment. By analyzing changes and interactions among these parameters, the system generates personalized risk scores that reflect individual patient variations, moving beyond single-parameter threshold-based guidelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple risk factors are evaluated individually, then comprehensive risk assessment is achieved, but the complexity of the assessment system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment comprehensivenessVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple individual risk factor evaluations into a single integrated predictive model. By combining demographic, clinical, and surgical factors into one unified machine learning algorithm, the system maintains comprehensive assessment capability while simplifying the user interface to present a single personalized risk score and set of recommendations, reducing the perceived complexity for clinicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal assessment tool that handles diverse risk factors through a single platform. The machine learning model is designed to process various types of input data (continuous variables like BMI, categorical variables like smoking status, and surgical-specific parameters) uniformly, enabling comprehensive evaluation without requiring separate assessment tools for different risk dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If manual risk assessment methods are used, then flexibility in evaluation is maintained, but time consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment flexibilityVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-assessment where the machine learning algorithm automatically processes patient input data and generates personalized risk predictions without requiring manual calculation or complex clinical judgment. The system serves itself by using structured data inputs to directly produce actionable risk scores and recommendations, eliminating time-consuming manual assessment steps while maintaining flexibility through programmable evaluation logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual, mechanical risk assessment processes with an automated computational model. Instead of clinicians manually evaluating each risk factor and synthesizing information, the machine learning algorithm automatically processes data and generates predictions, significantly reducing assessment time while preserving flexibility through configurable parameters and personalized output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20260024665A1Risk Score and Classification System for Prevention of Complications in Plastic Surgery
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 AIRA10 MEDICAL LLC
  • US20260024665A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024665A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024665A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A real-time method for risk assessment and prediction of complications in plastic surgery. It includes a scoring method that classifies patients in distinct levels or risk-groups according to a risk score. According to the variables present in each individual, the algorithm estimates a risk factor for that particular data set provided by the patient through a questionnaire, calculates a risk score, classifies each patient in a risk group, and displays results in different electronic devices and personalized apps.