Plastic Structural Component With Thin-Wall Pivot Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current structural components made of plastic materials require significant force to deform, especially when featuring complex geometric shapes with defined regions of reduced wall thickness, limiting their versatility and efficiency in applications like automotive bumper trims.

Innovation Solution

Structural components with regions of varying wall thickness, featuring a free-form geometry adapted to the surface, allowing for defined deformation possibilities with minimal actuator force, achieved through local wall thickness reductions, enabling reversible pivoting of inner regions with reduced material thickness between 10% and 90% of the total thickness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If local wall thickness reduction is applied to enable deformation, then deformation force is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation forceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local wall thickness reduction only in specific regions where deformation is needed, while maintaining full thickness in other areas. This creates zones of varying flexibility within a single component, allowing controlled deformation at targeted locations without compromising overall structural integrity, thereby reducing deformation force while managing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The wall thickness reduction is pre-formed during the manufacturing process (e.g., injection molding) rather than being created during assembly or operation. This preliminary preparation of deformation zones eliminates the need for additional machining or forming steps later, reducing both deformation force requirements and overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Force

If material thickness is reduced to enable bending, then bending stress is concentrated, but component strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending stress concentrationVSAvoidcomponent strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The component features localized thin-walled regions only where bending is required, while maintaining full material thickness in load-bearing and structural areas. This spatial differentiation allows bending stress concentration in controlled zones without compromising the overall strength and rigidity of the component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The component is effectively segmented into functional zones: flexible thin-walled regions for bending and deformation, and robust thick-walled regions for structural support. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally without interfering with the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex geometric shapes with defined deformation regions are created, then design flexibility is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements complex geometries with localized wall thickness variations that are directly integrated into the manufacturing process (such as injection molding). This approach allows high design flexibility with defined deformation regions while utilizing the inherent precision of modern molding techniques, avoiding the need for additional precision machining or assembly steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enables deformation with minimal actuator force, saving weight and costs, and allows for the opening and closure of flaps without visible expansions, enhancing durability and design flexibility in applications such as motor vehicle bumper trims.

Implementation Method 1

In this instance, in the context of a cyclical loading, it should be taken into account that the absorbed energy should be purely of the resilient type

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20230294626A1Structural Component
Publication Date: 2023.09.21 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US20230294626A1 patent drawing
  • US20230294626A1 patent drawing
  • US20230294626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural component made of a plastics material for a skin of a body of a motor vehicle has a separating line that separates the structural component into an inner region and an outer region. The inner region has three-dimensional regions having reduced material thickness for defined pivotability with a reduced force requirement. The design means that a significantly lower force requirement is needed for opening or closing the inner region.