Single-Step Plastic Waste Catalytic Decomposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for decomposing plastic waste into valuable chemicals and hydrocarbons are inefficient due to high temperatures required, formation of coke, and lack of control over product distribution, with existing techniques often involving two-stage processes and the use of synthetic catalysts.

Innovation Solution

A single-step thermo-catalytic process using a packed bed reactor with natural or spent zeolite catalysts, where plastic waste is thermally pretreated in an inert gas atmosphere and then contacted with inorganic porous material at moderate temperatures to produce hydrocarbons, allowing for the separation of hydrocarbons with 5-44 carbon atoms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If thermal cracking is used to depolymerize plastic waste, then monomers are released, but the chain lengths are not uniform and coke formation increases maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of monomer chain lengthsVSAvoidcoke formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the cracking process by using catalytic cracking instead of thermal cracking, operating at lower temperatures (300-600°C) with catalysts like ZSM-5 to achieve uniform product distribution and prevent coke formation that plagues thermal cracking methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces catalysts as intermediary substances that mediate the decomposition reaction, using solid acid catalysts such as zeolites to facilitate controlled breaking of polymer chains into uniform monomers and hydrocarbons without the harmful side effects of thermal cracking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If two-stage catalytic cracking is used to improve monomer uniformity, then product uniformity increases, but the process complexity and equipment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of decomposition productsVSAvoidnumber of processing stages
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the thermal cracking and catalytic cracking stages into a single integrated process, where plastic waste is directly contacted with catalyst particles in one reactor system, achieving both uniformity and simplicity simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the catalyst into small particles (0.1-10 mm) that can be fluidized or packed in a single reactor, allowing the entire decomposition process to occur in one stage rather than requiring multiple sequential reactors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If organometallic catalysts are used for catalytic cracking, then selective liquid fuel production is achieved, but the catalyst cost becomes prohibitively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity of liquid fuel productionVSAvoidcost of catalyst
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive organometallic catalysts with cheaper solid acid catalysts like natural and synthetic zeolites that can be used in larger quantities without prohibitive cost, making the process economically viable while maintaining product selectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes porous zeolite materials with specific pore structures that provide both catalytic activity and shape-selectivity for producing liquid fuels, achieving high selectivity through the physical structure rather than expensive metal complexes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Productivity

If high temperatures are used for thermal cracking, then decomposition efficiency increases, but energy consumption and operating costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecomposition rateVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter from high (thermal cracking) to moderate (300-600°C) by introducing catalysis, maintaining high decomposition rates through catalytic activity rather than thermal energy alone, thus reducing operating costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces energy costs, prevents coke formation, and achieves a more controlled product distribution, focusing on the production of premium fuels and chemicals like gasoline, diesel, and styrene, while utilizing natural zeolites for catalytic decomposition at atmospheric pressures.

Implementation Method 1

placing the plastic mass in contact with a bed of particles of porous inorganic material contained within the reaction apparatus at a temperature of 300° C. to 600° C.; inducing reactions of thermal-catalytic decomposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the plastic waste product to thermal pretreatment in order to produce a liquid plastic mass, wherein the thermal pretreatment of the plastic material is carried out in an inert gas atmosphere at a temperature varying between 110° C. and 310° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

inducing reactions of thermal-catalytic decomposition at a temperature between 300° C. and 600° C. to generate a mixture containing hydrocarbons in the vapor phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal-catalytic decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 4

separating the hydrocarbons from the vapor phase current generated within the reaction medium to produce a liquid mixture of hydrocarbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS10240093B2Method and equipment for producing hydrocarbons by catalytic decomposition of plastic waste products in a single step
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 NEWPEK S A DE
  • US10240093B2 patent drawing
  • US10240093B2 patent drawing
  • US10240093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method having the following steps: subjecting plastic waste material to a thermal pre-treatment in order to produce a liquid plastic mass, wherein the thermal pre-treatment of the plastic material is carried out in an inert gas atmosphere at a temperature that varies between 110° C. and 310° C.; simultaneously feeding the liquid plastic mass to a reaction apparatus; bringing the plastic mass into contact with a bed of particles of inorganic porous material contained inside the reaction apparatus at a temperature of between 300° and 600° C.; inducing thermocatalytic decomposition reactions at a temperature of between 300 and 600° C. in order to generate a mixture of hydrocarbons in a vapor phase; and separating the hydrocarbons from the vapor phase current generated inside the reaction means in order to produce a liquid mixture of hydrocarbons.