Plastic Wheel Hub Cover Structure for Lightweight Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wheel hub assemblies are non-competitive in terms of weight and production costs due to the use of metallic materials and rubbery sealing elements, which result in heavier and more expensive components.

Innovation Solution

A wheel hub assembly featuring a plastic cover instead of a metallic one, with a cylindrical mounting portion and engaging edge design that provides a fluid-tight seal and reduces the amount of metallic material required, allowing for a lighter and more cost-effective solution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a metallic cover with rubbery sealing element is used, then sealing reliability is improved, but weight and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameters by replacing metallic material with plastic material for the cover, and replacing rubbery sealing elements with integrated plastic sealing structures. This parameter change maintains sealing functionality while significantly reducing weight and production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material design where the plastic cover integrates multiple functions (structural support, sealing, and mounting) into a single component. The cover includes integrated sealing ribs and mounting portions that combine structural and sealing functions, eliminating the need for separate metallic cover and rubber seal components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If a metallic cover with rubbery sealing element is used, then sealing reliability is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple components into a single integrated plastic cover. The sealing ribs, mounting portions, and cover body are formed as one piece through injection molding, eliminating the need for separate metallic cover and rubber seal components. This integration reduces assembly steps and production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the manufacturing approach by using plastic injection molding to create the cover, which can be produced more cost-effectively than machining metallic covers and assembling rubber seals. The integrated design allows for high-volume production with consistent quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Weight of moving object

If a plastic cover is used, then weight and production cost are reduced, but sealing capability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidsealing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by incorporating sealing ribs at specific locations on the plastic cover where sealing is required. The cover includes annular sealing ribs that engage with corresponding features on the upright, providing localized sealing zones that maintain fluid-tight sealing despite the use of lighter plastic material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic cover is designed with integrated sealing structures that combine structural support and sealing functions. The sealing ribs are formed as integral parts of the plastic cover, creating a composite structure that provides both mechanical strength and fluid-tight sealing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If metallic materials are used for the cover, then structural strength is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from metal to plastic, selecting engineering plastics with sufficient strength-to-weight ratio. The plastic cover is designed with optimized wall thickness and integrated mounting portions that provide adequate structural strength while maintaining significantly lower weight compared to metallic alternatives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The plastic cover is designed as a composite structure that integrates mounting portions, sealing ribs, and cover body into a single component. This integrated design optimizes material distribution to provide necessary structural strength at critical locations while minimizing overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11807040B2Wheel hub assembly for vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US11807040B2 patent drawing
  • US11807040B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wheel hub assembly for mounting on an upright of a vehicle has a flanged outer ring provided with a tubular mounting portion inserted over a first axial length (L1) inside a seat of the upright; and a plastic cover having a mounting portion which is also engaged inside the tubular portion, wherein the mounting portion extends outside the tubular portion over a second axial length (L2) which, together with the first axial length (L1), covers less than a mounting length (L) inside the seat.