Automated Plate Relief Calibration via Real-Time UV Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for calibrating UV exposure settings for photopolymer printing plates with unknown concentrations of UV blockers result in variability in finished plate quality due to undefined time delays and inconsistent radiation doses, leading to unstable small printing elements.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically calibrating back exposure settings by measuring actinic radiation power through a photosensor, comparing it to a target value, and calculating a second setting to achieve a desired floor thickness, using a system with front and back radiation sources and a controller to adjust exposure intensity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual flipping or variable time delay processes are used between first and second exposure, then operational flexibility is maintained, but plate quality variability increases due to undefined elapsed time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidplate quality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a photosensor that detects the actual radiation power in real-time and provides feedback to the controller. The controller then automatically adjusts the exposure parameters based on this feedback, eliminating the need for manual intervention and ensuring consistent plate quality across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations (such as manual flipping of plates and manual adjustment of exposure settings) with an automated optical detection and control system. The photosensor and controller work together to automatically manage the exposure process, substituting human operation with precise mechanical and optical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If smaller printing plate elements are used to achieve smaller printed dots, then printing resolution improves, but element stability decreases making them more susceptible to damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprinting dot sizeVSAvoidelement stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts exposure parameters (radiation power, exposure time) based on real-time detection to optimize the curing process. By precisely controlling the radiation dose received by smaller plate elements, the system ensures adequate curing strength without requiring larger element sizes, thereby maintaining both small dot capability and element stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple manual calibration steps are performed to adjust floor thickness, then measurement accuracy improves, but process time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor thickness accuracyVSAvoidcalibration process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically detecting radiation power and adjusting exposure parameters without requiring manual measurement and adjustment steps. The photosensor and controller work together to autonomously determine the optimal exposure settings, eliminating the need for operator intervention in the calibration process while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If automated calibration with photosensor feedback is implemented, then plate quality consistency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplate quality consistencyVSAvoidsystem configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a photosensor that detects the actual radiation power in real-time and provides feedback to the controller. The controller then automatically adjusts the exposure parameters based on this feedback, eliminating the need for manual intervention and ensuring consistent plate quality across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures consistent and precise UV exposure, stabilizing small printing elements and reducing variability in finished plate quality, enabling production of smaller, more stable printing details.

Implementation Method 1

a photopolymer layer comprising a photosensitive polymer activated by exposure to actinic radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerisation: Photopolymerisation

Implementation Method 2

measuring the actinic radiation power (e.g. as irradiance -- power per unit of surface area) that reaches the photosensor through the plate precursor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP4575642A1Automated plate relief setting with UV LED exposure
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 ESKO GRAPHICS IMAGING
  • EP4575642A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4575642A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4575642A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a system and method for automatically calibrating back exposure settings for a batch of photopolymer printing plate precursors, each comprising a backing layer having an unknown concentration of actinic radiation (AR) blockers, a photosensitive polymer activated by exposure to AR, and a front mask layer. The method includes removing a portion of the front mask layer, positioning a photosensor on one side of the plate precursor aligned with the removed portion of the mask layer, exposing the plate to AR using a first setting, measuring the AR power that reaches the photosensor, comparing the measured AR power with a target AR power value expected to be received for the plate precursor, and calculating a second setting for the one or more radiation sources suitable to reach a desired floor thickness of a finished printing plate formed from the plate precursor receiving the actinic radiation from one or more radiation sources.