Dual-Platen Cooking Control Using Food Thickness Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking apparatuses with two platens require manual input of parameters, leading to potential user errors in setting the correct gap distance and food type, which can result in undercooked or overcooked food due to incorrect settings.

Innovation Solution

A cooking apparatus with a positioning mechanism and detector system that automatically controls the relative motion of the platens, using sensors and a controller to adjust for food thickness and temperature, ensuring precise contact and cooking time based on detected impediments and temperature changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual input of parameters is used to control platen motion, then the device complexity is reduced, but user error increases leading to incorrect gap distance and cooking time settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanismVSAvoidparameter setting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines cooking parameters by detecting food properties itself, eliminating the need for manual user input. The controller autonomously selects gap distance and cooking time based on detector signals, making the system self-sufficient and removing the error-prone manual configuration step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual parameter input is replaced with an automated detection and control system. Detectors sense food properties and the controller automatically translates these signals into appropriate cooking parameters, substituting human operation with sensor-based automation to eliminate user error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If automated parameter selection is implemented, then user error is reduced, but device complexity increases due to additional detectors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter setting accuracyVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detector serves multiple functions: it detects food presence, determines food type, and infers food thickness, all to automatically set cooking parameters. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate sensors for each parameter, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while achieving reliable automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its operational parameters (gap distance, cooking time, temperature) based on detector signals that identify food properties. The controller dynamically adjusts these parameters according to the detected impediment characteristics, enabling adaptive cooking without requiring complex pre-programming for every food type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If preset gap distances are manually configured for different food types, then adaptability to various food products is achieved, but the ease of operation decreases due to required manual input

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood type accommodationVSAvoidparameter input process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adapts to different food types by detecting their properties and self-configuring the appropriate parameters. The user simply places food on the platen and starts the process, eliminating the need to manually select food types or input parameters, thereby greatly simplifying operation while maintaining full adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of food properties before cooking begins, using this information to pre-configure the optimal cooking parameters. This preliminary action of detecting and setting parameters automatically prepares the system for the specific food type without requiring user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If automated detection and adjustment of platen position is implemented, then manufacturing precision of cooking parameters is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap distance controlVSAvoidpositioning mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detector provides feedback signals to the controller based on the detected impediment, which then automatically adjusts the platen position to achieve the correct gap distance. This closed-loop feedback system ensures precise positioning without requiring complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms, as the system self-corrects based on sensor input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces user error by automatically adjusting platen position and cooking time, ensuring consistent cooking results by detecting food presence and thickness, and compensating for variations in food load, thereby improving cooking precision and reducing the risk of under or overcooking.

Implementation Method 1

A detector is disposed to provide a signal in response to detection of an impediment to the motion of the second platen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpediment detection:

Implementation Method 2

the controller in a preheat mode further controls a heater to apply thermal energy to at least one zone of the first platen and to the second platen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy transfer: Heating

Implementation Method 3

a positioning mechanism that moves the second platen toward and/or away from the first platen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical motion control:

Data Source

PatentEP1887916B1Cooking apparatus and method with product recognition
Publication Date: 2017.03.22 GARLAND COMML IND INC
  • EP1887916B1 patent drawing
  • EP1887916B1 patent drawing
  • EP1887916B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cooking apparatus having first and second platens with product recognition. A positioning mechanism moves the second platen toward the first. A detector senses the second platen making contact with a food product disposed on the first platen and provides a signal. A controller uses the signal to measure the travel distance of the second platen. The product thickness is a function of the travel distance, which is used to select a cooking procedure for the food product. The controller then executes the selected cooking procedure to cook the food product. The detector can include a micro switch, proximity sensor, touch sensor, strain sensor, thermal sensor, optical sensor, sonar sensor or positioning load change sensor.