Service Platform Anomaly Detection for New Device Fraud Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anomaly detection techniques for service platforms are often inaccurate, leading to false positives and wastage of computing and network resources due to misclassification of authorized access attempts as fraudulent, especially when new devices or locations are used.

Innovation Solution

A service platform monitoring system uses a machine learning model trained on service usage patterns and source data to accurately detect anomalies, including retraining based on feedback, to differentiate between authorized and unauthorized access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing anomaly detection techniques are used to detect fraudulent access, then security monitoring is provided, but accuracy is poor leading to false positives and negatives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by training machine learning models on historical service usage data before actual fraud detection occurs. The models learn normal behavior patterns in advance, enabling them to accurately distinguish authorized from unauthorized access attempts. This preliminary training phase is crucial for achieving high detection accuracy while minimizing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results and verification outcomes are fed back into the model training process. This continuous feedback loop allows the models to learn from actual cases, improving their accuracy over time. The feedback principle addresses the reliability issue by enabling the system to reduce false positives through iterative learning from real-world data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive fraud detection analysis is performed on all API calls, then security is improved, but computing and network resources are wasted due to misclassification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity levelVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using machine learning models to pre-screen API calls and identify only those with anomalous characteristics warranting further investigation. Instead of performing comprehensive fraud detection analysis on all calls, the system focuses resources on suspicious cases, significantly reducing computing and network resource consumption while maintaining high security levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated machine learning-based anomaly detection that operates without requiring manual review of every API call. The models autonomously analyze access patterns, identify potential fraud, and trigger verification only when necessary. This self-service capability reduces resource waste by eliminating unnecessary comprehensive analysis of clearly authorized access attempts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then basic security monitoring is provided, but sophisticated fraud methods are not effectively detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical fraud detection methods with machine learning-based intelligent analysis. Instead of relying on fixed rules and manual inspection, the system uses trained models that can automatically adapt to sophisticated fraud patterns. This substitution dramatically improves adaptability to new fraud methods while the automated nature of machine learning reduces operational complexity despite the advanced technology involved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves adaptability through parameter changes in the machine learning models, which can adjust their detection parameters and patterns based on learned data. The models dynamically modify their analysis approach to match emerging fraud techniques, providing versatility without requiring manual reconfiguration. This parameter-based adaptability allows the system to handle sophisticated fraud methods while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12563061B2Detection of anomalies associated with fraudulent access to a service platform
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12563061B2 patent drawing
  • US12563061B2 patent drawing
  • US12563061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a system may obtain a first model that is trained to identify feature data associated with a client system using one or more services of a service platform. The system may train, based on the feature data, a second model to identify anomalies associated with devices accessing the one or more services in association with a client identifier of the client system. The system may receive access data associated with an acting device accessing a service of the service platform. The system may determine, using the second model, that the acting device accessing the service corresponds to potential anomalous activity based on the access information. The system may obtain, from a verification device, a verification that the acting device accessing the service is anomalous activity. The system may perform, based on obtaining the verification, an action associated with the acting device.