Platform Authentication Module for Software State Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing authentication methods for platforms lack reliable mechanisms to verify the authenticity of software stacks and hardware states, particularly in ensuring deterministic behavior and integrity across multiple boots and processor configurations.

Innovation Solution

An authentication module consistent with Trusted Platform Module (TPM) criteria is used to measure and certify the software stack by generating hashes and creation tickets, ensuring a deterministic software state and binding them with a creation hash for verification, even across multiple processor cores and boots.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional authentication methods are used for platform verification, then the authentication process is simple, but the reliability and integrity verification of software stacks and hardware states is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidauthentication module complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An authentication module consistent with TPM criteria is introduced as an intermediary component between the processor and the verification process. This module measures and certifies the software stack, generating hashes and creation tickets that bind the software state to hardware identities, thereby enhancing authentication reliability without requiring complete redesign of the verification system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication module performs preliminary measurement and certification of the software stack during system initialization and boot processes. By pre-generating hashes of software elements and binding them to hardware manufacturer identities before execution, the system ensures integrity verification is already in place before potential unauthorized changes can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive measurement and certification of software stack is performed, then platform integrity is ensured, but the processing time and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform integrity verificationVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The software stack is segmented into discrete measurable elements (firmware, operating system components, applications). Each element is measured and hashed independently, allowing parallel processing and efficient verification. The authentication module processes these segmented elements through a structured workflow that reduces overall verification time while maintaining comprehensive coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical verification methods are replaced with cryptographic hash-based verification. Instead of comparing entire software images or performing exhaustive checks, the system uses cryptographic hash functions to create compact digital fingerprints of software elements, enabling rapid comparison and verification with minimal computational overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If deterministic software state is enforced across multiple boots, then authentication consistency is improved, but the flexibility in processor configurations and software updates is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication consistencyVSAvoidprocessor configuration flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system dynamically adapts to different processor configurations and software versions while maintaining deterministic verification. The authentication module measures the actual software stack present on each boot, regardless of configuration variations, and binds the measurement to the hardware manufacturer identity. This allows legitimate updates and configurations while preventing unauthorized changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes its verification parameters based on the detected software stack configuration. Instead of requiring identical software images across all boots, the system verifies that the measured software elements match the expected structure and authorization, allowing parameter variations in legitimate updates while maintaining authentication consistency through the creation ticket verification mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11886593B2Verification of a provisioned state of a platform
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US11886593B2 patent drawing
  • US11886593B2 patent drawing
  • US11886593B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of certifying a state of a platform includes receiving one or more software elements of a software stack of the platform by an authentication module and performing a hash algorithm on the software stack to generate one or more hash values. The software stack uniquely determines a software state of the platform. The method includes generating creation data, a creation hash, and a creation ticket, corresponding to the hash values and sending the creation ticket to the platform. The method also includes receiving the creation ticket by the authentication module and certifying the creation data and the creation hash based on the creation ticket. The method further includes generating a certified structure based on the creation data and performing the hash algorithm on the certified structure to generate a hash of the certified structure. The certified structure uniquely determines the software state of the platform.