Stationary Platform Locking Assemblies That Prevent Column and Leg Loosening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current locking mechanisms for multi-piece center columns and telescoping legs of stationary platforms, such as tripods, fail to provide sufficient stability, leading to accidental loosening and detachment during use.

Innovation Solution

A locking assembly that secures two column portions together using a non-circular insert and fastening rod system, preventing rotation and ensuring secure engagement, and a locking mechanism for telescoping legs with a locking ring, rotation stop, and locking nut to prevent unintended disengagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If threading is used to join column pieces, then the connection allows for length adjustment and weight reduction, but the threads unintentionally loosen during axial rotation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelength adjustmentVSAvoidconnection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into separate functional components: a locking element with non-circular cross-section that prevents rotation, and a fastening element that secures the connection. This segmentation allows the column to maintain both adjustability and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking element features a non-circular cross-section (square, rectangular, triangular, or polygonal) that creates an asymmetric interface. This asymmetry prevents rotational movement while maintaining a secure sliding fit, resolving the issue of thread loosening during rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of operation

If twist-lock designs are used for telescoping legs, then the locking mechanism is simple to operate, but the lock can unthread and legs can collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking operationVSAvoidlock stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element uses a non-circular cross-section that fits into a corresponding non-circular cavity in the leg section. This asymmetric geometry allows the lock to be easily engaged and disengaged while preventing any rotational movement that could cause unthreading or collapse.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The locking element acts as an intermediary component between the telescoping leg sections. It provides a positive mechanical stop that prevents over-rotation and ensures the leg sections remain securely locked at the desired length.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple locking components are added to prevent loosening, then connection stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection stabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking and fastening functions are combined into a single integrated mechanism. The non-circular locking element and fastening rod work together as one system, eliminating the need for separate locking components and reducing overall complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11313510B2Column and leg locking assemblies for stationary platforms
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 SHELTERED WINGS INC D B A VORTEX OPTICS
  • US11313510B2 patent drawing
  • US11313510B2 patent drawing
  • US11313510B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to locking assemblies. In one embodiment, the disclosure relates to locking assemblies for a center column of a stationary platform. In another embodiment, the disclosure relates to locking assemblies for legs of a stationary platform.