Automated Platooning Control with Dynamic Leader Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated driving systems, particularly at Level 3 and Level 4, are limited in operational design domains and require human intervention when conditions change, such as lane reduction or inclement weather, leading to inefficiencies and reduced riding comfort in cargo-type vehicles.

Innovation Solution

An automated platooning system that dynamically switches between leader vehicles using Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication, allowing for autonomous driving by selecting a new leader vehicle when conditions become unfavorable, ensuring continuous operation without human intervention and maintaining riding comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated driving operates at Level 3-4 with fixed ODD, then system reliability is improved, but adaptability deteriorates when conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated driving reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic switching between multiple leader vehicles based on real-time operational conditions. When the current leader vehicle can no longer maintain safe operating conditions (e.g., lane reduction, heavy rain), the automated vehicle dynamically switches to a new leader vehicle, enabling continuous adaptive operation without human intervention and resolving the contradiction between reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by transitioning between different driving modes (platooning mode with leader vehicle association and autonomous mode without association) based on environmental conditions. This parameter change allows the system to maintain reliability across varying conditions by adjusting its operational state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If control is handed over to driver or stopped via MRM, then safety is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to human intervention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddriving efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated vehicle performs self-service by automatically switching between leader vehicles when operational conditions change. Instead of requiring human driver intervention or stopping via MRM, the system autonomously manages its own operation continuity by selecting new leader vehicles, thereby maintaining both safety and productivity without human involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuous useful action by implementing seamless transitions between leader vehicles. When the current leader becomes unsuitable, the system continuously maintains automated driving operation by switching to an alternative leader vehicle, eliminating interruptions and maintaining productivity while preserving safety through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If Level 5 autonomous driving is implemented, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex Level 5 autonomous driving function into manageable components: platooning mode with leader association, autonomous mode without association, and dynamic switching logic. By dividing the overall system into these functional segments, the implementation complexity is reduced while maintaining full operational flexibility across different conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240160219A1Automated platooning system and method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.05.16 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20240160219A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160219A1 patent drawing
  • US20240160219A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a method of controlling an automated platooning vehicle for driving on a traveling path including n-th to (n+2)-th (n is integer) sections, comprises receiving from a server information of a first leader vehicle capable of leading the automated platooning vehicle at the n-th section, performing platoon driving in association with the first leader vehicle at the n-th section, performing autonomous driving of the automated platooning vehicle out of association with the first leader vehicle at the (n+1)-th section, receiving from the server information of a second leader vehicle capable of leading the automated platooning vehicle at the (n+2)-th section, and performing platoon driving in association with the second leader vehicle at the (n+2)-th section.