Platooning Vehicle Precognitive Braking for Hazard Gap Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle platooning systems face challenges in maintaining a safe gap between vehicles while ensuring road safety, particularly in encountering hazards, as the lead vehicle's reaction can increase risks for following vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A system and method where a following vehicle in a platoon uses sensors to detect hazards and takes preemptive actions, such as increasing the gap by reducing velocity, before the lead vehicle reacts, utilizing tiered severity threat levels and pre-cognitive braking to mitigate risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the lead vehicle reacts to hazards first in a platoon, then the lead vehicle can respond to the hazard, but the following vehicle may collide with the lead vehicle due to the reduced reaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard response effectivenessVSAvoidcollision risk for following vehicle
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The following vehicle performs preliminary hazard detection using its own sensors before the lead vehicle reacts. When a hazard is detected, the following vehicle preemptively increases the gap by reducing velocity, ensuring safety before the lead vehicle's reaction occurs. This preliminary action resolves the contradiction by enabling the following vehicle to protect itself in advance against the harmful effect of limited reaction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The following vehicle's hazard detection system acts as an intermediary safety mechanism. Instead of relying solely on the lead vehicle's reaction, the following vehicle independently detects hazards and intermediates the safety response by preemptively adjusting its velocity. This intermediary action ensures that the following vehicle can respond safely even when the lead vehicle's reaction is insufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If the following vehicle maintains a smaller gap to the lead vehicle, then fuel efficiency is improved, but safety is compromised when hazards are encountered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidsafety during hazard events
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The following vehicle dynamically adjusts the gap based on real-time hazard conditions. During normal operation, a smaller gap maintains fuel efficiency. When hazards are detected, the system dynamically increases the gap by reducing velocity, thereby adapting to changing safety requirements. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing the gap to be small when safe and large when hazardous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the gap parameter (distance between vehicles) based on hazard detection. Under normal conditions, the gap remains small for fuel efficiency. When hazards are detected, the gap parameter is increased through velocity reduction, transforming the safety margin. This parameter change enables the system to optimize both fuel efficiency and safety under different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the following vehicle takes preemptive action before the lead vehicle, then collision risk is reduced, but the platoon coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision riskVSAvoidcontrol system coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hazard response function is segmented between the lead vehicle and following vehicle. The lead vehicle handles hazard response for objects in front of it, while the following vehicle independently handles hazard detection and preemptive response for the same space. This segmentation allows each vehicle to operate semi-independently, reducing the coordination complexity while maintaining safety through distributed hazard detection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12050474B2System and method for implementing precognition braking and/or avoiding or mitigation risks among platooning vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 PELOTON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12050474B2 patent drawing
  • US12050474B2 patent drawing
  • US12050474B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for mitigating or avoiding risks due to hazards encountered by platooning vehicles. The system and method involve interrogating, with one or more sensors, a space radially extending from a lead vehicle as the lead vehicle travels over the road surface, perceiving the environment within the space, ascertaining a hazard caused by an object in the space, and causing a following vehicle, operating in a platoon with the lead vehicle, to take a preemptive braking action to avoid or mitigate risks resulting from the hazard caused by the object in the space.