Playground Play Value Assessment System Using Multi-Dimensional Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for assessing playground play value only consider the number of play affordances, failing to account for the variety of play opportunities, challenge levels, and social play elements, which limits their ability to accurately evaluate a playground's entertainment value for children.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that evaluate playground play value by identifying types of play opportunities, counting unique components within each type, assessing challenge levels, and assigning an overall rating based on the number of components, unique components, and challenge levels, while also considering components that promote social play.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional methods only count the number of play affordances, then the assessment is simple, but the accuracy of evaluating playground entertainment value deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of assessmentVSAvoidaccuracy of play value evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the play value assessment into multiple dimensions: variety of play opportunities, uniqueness of components, challenge levels, and social play elements. Each dimension is evaluated separately and then integrated to produce a comprehensive play value score, transforming a simple count into a multi-faceted evaluation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds multiple evaluation dimensions beyond the simple quantity count. Instead of assessing only the number of play affordances, the system evaluates variety (different types of play opportunities), uniqueness (distinctive components), challenge levels (difficulty progression), and social aspects (interactive elements), creating a multi-dimensional assessment framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the assessment considers multiple factors including variety, uniqueness, challenge levels, and social elements, then the accuracy of play value evaluation improves, but the complexity of the assessment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of play value evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of assessment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex assessment is divided into manageable segments: identifying play opportunities, categorizing components, evaluating challenge levels, and assessing social elements. Each segment can be processed independently, allowing the system to handle complexity through systematic breakdown rather than attempting to evaluate all factors simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal assessment framework that can evaluate multiple aspects of playground value through a single integrated system. The same methodology and scoring mechanisms are applied across all dimensions (variety, uniqueness, challenge, social), providing a consistent multi-functional evaluation tool that handles diverse assessment requirements uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240013121A1Method and System for Assessing Play Value of a Playground
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 PLAYCORE WISCONSIN INC
  • US20240013121A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013121A1 patent drawing
  • US20240013121A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides methods and systems for determining the play value of a playground, the challenge level of a playground, or both. In some embodiments, the methods and systems may propose modifications to a playground that would result in an effective and efficient increase in the play value of the playground, a desired increase or decrease in the challenge level of the playground, or both. Further, in some embodiments, the methods and systems may be configured to provide comparisons of various playgrounds in order to determine which playgrounds are of greatest play value. In some embodiments, the methods and systems may be incorporated into software that is configured for the design of playgrounds.