PLC Configuration Comparison for Faster Factory Automation Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques fail to support users in designing new system configurations for factory automation, resulting in increased burden on users when constructing new configurations to meet their desires.

Innovation Solution

A system configuration proposal device that includes an input part for user selection, a comparison part to compare the existing PLC system configuration with a selected case, and a proposal part that suggests new devices required to realize the user's desired system configuration based on the comparison results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If users design a new system configuration from scratch to meet their desires, then the system can be customized to exactly match user requirements, but the design burden and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem customizationVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-stores multiple reference configuration examples that have been designed in advance. When a user needs a new configuration, the system retrieves and presents these pre-prepared examples for selection and modification, eliminating the need to design from scratch while still allowing customization to meet specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates new configurations by copying and adapting existing reference configurations. Users can select from stored configuration examples and modify them to suit their specific needs, rather than designing entirely new configurations. This copying approach maintains customization capability while dramatically reducing design time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If users design a new system configuration from scratch to meet their desires, then the system can be optimized for specific needs, but the complexity of the design process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem customizationVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Reference configurations are prepared in advance with proper structure and optimization. When users need a new configuration, they select from these pre-structured examples rather than creating the structure from scratch, which simplifies the design process while maintaining the ability to customize specific parameters to meet optimization needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Users copy proven configurations that already have optimized structures. The copying process inherits the organized structure and relationships from the reference examples, reducing design complexity. Users can then make targeted modifications to achieve specific optimizations without having to reconstruct the entire configuration structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional techniques compare design information with actual configuration information, then configuration accuracy can be verified, but the techniques cannot support the design of new system configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration accuracyVSAvoidnew configuration design support
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system extends the comparison function to work in reverse for design support. Instead of only comparing user designs with actual configurations, the system stores reference configurations in advance and compares them with user requirements, enabling the system to actively support new configuration design by suggesting appropriate reference examples that match user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240019835A1System configuration proposal device and system configuration proposal method
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 OMRON CORP
  • US20240019835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240019835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240019835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention reduces the burden on a user when constructing a new system configuration for realizing the desires of the user. The input part (21) accepts a user's selection for the case. A comparison part (23) compares an existing user system configuration that includes a programmable logic controller (PLC), and a system configuration corresponding to the selected case. On the basis of the comparison results, a display part (22) presents, to the user, a new system configuration that includes the device necessary in order to realize said case.