PLC Neural Co-Processor Integration for Real-Time Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional controllers lack support for neural computing features, requiring cloud computing systems for processing tasks, which limits real-time on-board processing in industrial automation environments, and existing integration methods are cumbersome or impossible due to cycle time mismatches.

Innovation Solution

Integration of a neural co-processor with a programmable logic controller (PLC) to execute machine learning models directly on-board, using a co-processor connected via USB or similar, allowing seamless integration and real-time processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If cloud computing systems are used for neural computing tasks, then processing capabilities are improved, but real-time on-board processing is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidreal-time processing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the neural computing functionality from cloud-based systems and implements it as a dedicated neural co-processor unit that can be embedded within or connected to the PLC. This allows the neural network processing to occur locally on the controller rather than remotely in the cloud, enabling real-time inference while maintaining the processing power needed for complex machine learning models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a neural co-processor as an intermediary component between the PLC and the neural network model. This co-processor serves as a specialized processing unit that handles neural computing tasks, acting as a bridge between the control system and the machine learning algorithms, thereby enabling efficient real-time processing without requiring full cloud connectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If additional CPU power is added to the controller, then neural computing capabilities are improved, but integration with PLC cycle time becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural computing capabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the controller architecture into distinct functional units: the PLC handles traditional control logic and cycle-time-critical tasks, while the neural co-processor handles machine learning inference. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently at its optimal speed and cycle time, with communication between them through well-defined interfaces, thereby reducing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a specialized copy of processing capability in the form of a neural co-processor that is specifically designed for neural network operations. Rather than trying to enhance the general-purpose PLC CPU with neural computing capabilities, a dedicated neural processing unit is introduced that can be integrated through standardized interfaces, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If simple neural models are executed in multi-core controllers, then ease of operation is improved, but processing power is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneural model executionVSAvoidprocessing power
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the architectural parameters of the controller by introducing a dedicated neural co-processor with specialized hardware accelerators designed specifically for neural network operations. This allows the system to execute complex neural models with millions of parameters that would be computationally infeasible on general-purpose multi-core CPUs, while maintaining ease of operation through standardized integration interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12585936B2Neural logic controllers
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 SIEMENS AG
  • US12585936B2 patent drawing
  • US12585936B2 patent drawing
  • US12585936B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for executing a machine learning model with a controller includes a processor within the controller writing input values to a process image within the controller. The term process image refers to a predefined address space within volatile memory of the controller. A co-processor connected to the controller reads the input values from the process image and applies a machine learning model to the input values to generate output values. The co-processor writes output values to the process image and the processor reads those output values from the process image. The process can then execute an application program that utilizes the one or more output values.