PLD Context Switching with Redundant Active-Instance Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional programmable logic devices (PLDs) face challenges in efficiently switching between user designs without interrupting functionality, particularly in safety-critical and security-critical applications, as they often require partial reconfiguration that leads to discontinuity and single-point failures.

Innovation Solution

A context switching system that allows for rapid and complete reconfiguration of PLDs by maintaining one active instance at a time, enabling seamless transitions between logic instances with synchronized data transfer and lockstep operations, ensuring continuous functionality and redundancy to avoid single-point failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If partial reconfiguration is used to switch between user designs, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to discontinuity and single-point failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching between user designsVSAvoidcontinuous functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the PLD into multiple independent instances (first instance, second instance, third instance), each capable of operating autonomously. This segmentation allows one instance to serve as active while others remain inactive or are reconfigured, enabling design switching without interrupting the active instance and thus maintaining reliability while improving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares backup instances in advance (inactive or reconfigured state) before they are needed. When a design switch is required, the pre-prepared instance can immediately take over, avoiding service interruption. This preliminary preparation of alternative configurations resolves the contradiction by ensuring reliability through pre-planned failover capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If rapid context switching is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple instances and synchronization mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration speedVSAvoidmultiple instances and control mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple PLD instances share common resources including I/O banks, configuration memory, and control logic. This merging approach allows rapid context switching between instances without requiring separate dedicated resources for each, thereby achieving high productivity while limiting the increase in device complexity through resource sharing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The PLD instances are designed with universal, identical resource sets (same I/O banks, same logic resources, same configuration structure). This multi-functionality allows any instance to take over any role, simplifying the control mechanism for context switching and reducing overall system complexity while enabling rapid switching for high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If redundant systems are deployed to prevent single-point failures, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure preventionVSAvoidredundant system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic redundancy where instances can transition between active and inactive states based on operational needs. Rather than maintaining permanent redundant structures, the system activates backup instances only when needed for failover, reducing average device complexity while ensuring reliability when failures occur. The redundancy is flexible and adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

When a failure is detected in the active instance, the system discards the failed instance and recovers by activating a pre-prepared inactive instance. This approach maintains reliability through redundancy while minimizing device complexity by keeping backup instances in a low-power, minimal-resource state until they are needed for recovery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20250356096A1Context switching systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 LATTICE SEMICON CORP
  • US20250356096A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356096A1 patent drawing
  • US20250356096A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various techniques are provided to implement context switching systems and methods. In one example, a system includes a plurality of programmable logic devices (PLDs) each configured to be in an active state or an inactive state. At most one of the plurality of PLDs is in the active state to provide PLD functionality. The system further includes an instance controller configured to communicate with each of the plurality of PLDs and control context switch aspects to set each of the plurality of PLDs to the active state or the inactive state. Related methods and devices are provided.