Pleural Effusion Implant With Pressure-Driven Fluid Recirculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for pleural effusion, such as catheter-based fluid drainage, are inefficient and can lead to fluid reaccumulation, infections, and protein loss, failing to recirculate fluid within the patient.

Innovation Solution

An implant with a collecting chamber, lateral valves, and a clamping arrangement that allows for reliable fluid extraction and recirculation without external catheters, utilizing a design that attaches to tissue to maintain minimal patient burden.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If catheter-based drainage is used to remove fluid from the pleural cavity, then fluid extraction is achieved, but fluid reaccumulation occurs and requires repeated interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid extraction reliabilityVSAvoidtime for repeated interventions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The implant enables self-regulating fluid drainage through the valve mechanism that automatically opens when pleural pressure exceeds abdominal pressure, eliminating the need for external pumps or repeated catheter interventions. The system serves itself by using the pressure differential to control fluid flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The implant provides continuous fluid drainage capability through the always-present valve mechanism, ensuring that fluid can be removed whenever the pressure gradient exists, rather than requiring periodic catheter insertions. This creates an uninterrupted drainage function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Reliability

If external catheters are used for fluid drainage, then fluid removal is achieved, but infection risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid removal effectivenessVSAvoidinfection risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the drainage function from the external catheter system and relocates it to an implanted device. The catheter is removed from the body after implantation, eliminating the ongoing external access point that serves as an infection pathway while maintaining fluid drainage capability through the implanted valve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The implanted valve acts as an intermediary between the pleural cavity and the external environment, providing controlled fluid egress through a sealed, biocompatible structure rather than through an open catheter tract that exposes the patient to infection risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If fluid is drained externally, then fluid extraction is achieved, but protein loss occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid drainage effectivenessVSAvoidprotein loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the previously harmful effect of protein loss into a beneficial recirculation system. Fluid that would have been discarded externally is now redirected back to the patient's body through the implant, transforming waste removal into a resource recovery function that maintains protein levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Reliability

If repeated catheter interventions are performed, then fluid reaccumulation is treated, but patient burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid management effectivenessVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The implant performs the drainage function in advance and continuously, preventing fluid reaccumulation before it becomes a problem requiring intervention. The valve is already in place and functioning, eliminating the need for future catheter insertions and associated patient discomfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The implant effectively manages pleural effusion by ensuring continuous fluid removal and recirculation, reducing infection risk and protein loss, while minimizing patient discomfort and intervention frequency.

Implementation Method 1

The valves are designed to allow for fluid flow when the pressure differential between the pleural cavity and the abdominal cavity exceeds a predetermined value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4703001A1Implant for treatment of pleural effusion
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 EWIMED GMBH
  • EP4703001A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4703001A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4703001A1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4d

AI summary

The present invention relates to an implant for treatment of pleural effusion characterized in that it comprises a collecting chamber (4) with a proximal inlet, at least one distal lateral valve (31), which is connected to the collecting chamber (4) for draining fluid from the collecting chamber (4), and a clamping arrangement for attaching the implant (1) to tissue.