PLL Clock Source Switching for Lower Wireless Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern electronic devices face interference issues in wireless communication channels due to clocking signals, which are exacerbated by the need to switch between different communication channels and standards, making it challenging to find a single 'safe' frequency for the clock source.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that adjusts the phase locked loop (PLL) clock source by switching from a static clock to a modulated or programmable clock, aligning the latter using a phase detector and counter to prevent loss of lock, and utilizing a spread spectrum clock to mitigate interference by constantly modulating the frequency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a static clock is used during device initialization, then the device can operate during boot up, but wireless communication interference occurs and loss of lock may occur when switching clocks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclock switching reliabilityVSAvoidwireless communication interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static clock source to a dynamic/programmable clock source that can adjust its frequency. The programmable clock allows the system to change clock frequencies based on operational requirements, thereby reducing wireless communication interference while maintaining reliable operation during initialization and switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the clock frequency parameter. A programmable clock source is used that can change its operating frequency to avoid interfering with wireless communication channels. The system adjusts clock frequency parameters dynamically to eliminate interference while maintaining system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a modulated or programmable clock is used to reduce interference, then wireless communication interference is reduced, but the clock may not be available during initialization and alignment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless communication interferenceVSAvoidclock alignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary alignment mechanism between the static and programmable clock sources. This intermediary system includes circuitry and methods that automatically align the phase and frequency of the programmable clock with the static clock, thereby reducing interference complexity and simplifying the transition process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing clock alignment procedures before the programmable clock becomes fully operational. The system prepares the clock switching mechanism in advance, ensuring that when the programmable clock is activated, it is already aligned with the static clock, preventing loss of lock and reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If clock frequency is changed to avoid interference, then wireless communication channels are protected, but loss of lock occurs during transition from first clock to second clock

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewireless communication interferenceVSAvoidPLL lock stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by preparing the PLL and clock switching mechanism in advance to prevent loss of lock. The system includes alignment circuitry and control methods that ensure the programmable clock is pre-synchronized with the static clock before switching, providing a cushion against potential lock loss during frequency transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms to monitor PLL lock status during clock transitions. The system uses feedback from the PLL to detect potential loss of lock conditions and adjusts the clock switching timing and parameters accordingly, ensuring stable transitions while changing clock frequencies to avoid wireless communication interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively reduces wireless communication interference by aligning and switching clock signals, ensuring continuous operation without losing lock, even when switching between different wireless communication channels.

Implementation Method 1

The phase detector may detect whether the two clocks are aligned. If they are not aligned, the phase detector may modify the counter (e.g., either up or down) based on the difference in phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase detection:

Data Source

PatentUS20120127133A1Switching a PLL Clock Source to Reduce Wireless Communication Interference
Publication Date: 2012.05.24 APPLE INC
  • US20120127133A1 patent drawing
  • US20120127133A1 patent drawing
  • US20120127133A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Adjusting a phase locked loop (PLL) clock source to reduce wireless communication (e.g., radio frequency (RF)) interference within a device. The PLL may be included in a high speed serial interface, e.g., coupled to a display, and may be initially driven by a first clock. Later, when a second clock is available and aligned with the first clock, the PLL may be driven by the second clock. The second clock may be configured to change its frequency over time such that the PLL does not lose lock and also does not interfere (or reduces interference) with wireless communication of the device. For example, the second clock may be programmable or may dynamically vary its operating frequency, thereby reducing its interference with the wireless communication of the device.