PLSA Predictive Coding for Faster, More Accurate Document Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual document review is resource-intensive and prone to inconsistencies and inefficiencies, particularly with large volumes of documents, leading to increased time and cost without adequate quality control.

Innovation Solution

Implement predictive coding using probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) to automate document review, limiting manual human review to a subset and utilizing machine learning to enhance accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual document review is performed by humans, then document analysis quality can be maintained, but review time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument analysis qualityVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document review process into two distinct phases: (1) automated review using predictive coding for the majority of documents, and (2) manual human review for a reduced subset of documents that require higher-level judgment. This segmentation allows the system to leverage the speed of automation while preserving human quality control where needed, thereby reducing overall review time while maintaining document analysis quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces predictive coding technology as an intermediary between complete automation and complete manual review. This intermediary system uses machine learning algorithms to pre-review and score documents, presenting only the most relevant or uncertain documents to human reviewers. This intermediary layer dramatically reduces the volume of documents requiring manual attention while maintaining overall review quality through the feedback loop between automated scoring and human validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual document review is performed by humans, then document analysis accuracy can be ensured, but costs and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument analysis accuracyVSAvoidcosts and resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service automated review system that uses predictive coding to independently evaluate and score documents without requiring extensive human intervention. The system trains machine learning models on initial human-coded documents, then uses these models to automatically code and prioritize the remaining document corpus. This self-service approach dramatically reduces human resource consumption and costs while maintaining accuracy through iterative validation and confidence thresholding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual human review with an automated predictive coding system based on machine learning algorithms. This substitution uses computational processes to perform document analysis, scoring, and prioritization tasks that would otherwise require human reviewers. The transition from mechanical human review to automated computational review significantly reduces costs and resource consumption while maintaining or improving consistency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If complete automated coding is used, then review speed increases, but reliability and accuracy decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview speedVSAvoidcoding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback loop where the automated predictive coding system continuously learns from human reviewer corrections and validations. Human reviewers code a subset of documents, and this coded data is fed back into the machine learning model to refine and improve its algorithms. This feedback mechanism ensures that the automated system progressively improves its accuracy and reliability while maintaining high review speeds, resolving the contradiction between automation speed and coding accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial automation rather than complete automation, using predictive coding to process the majority of documents at high speed while reserving manual human review for a smaller subset of documents that require higher accuracy or represent edge cases. This partial action approach allows the system to achieve high overall review speed while maintaining reliability through selective human oversight, rather than requiring complete automation to achieve speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12572857B2Adaptive probabilistic latent semantic analysis system for automated document coding and review in electronic discovery
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US12572857B2 patent drawing
  • US12572857B2 patent drawing
  • US12572857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for analyzing documents are provided herein. A plurality of documents and user input are received via a computing device. The user input includes hard coding of a subset of the plurality of documents, based on an identified subject or category. Instructions stored in memory are executed by a processor to generate an initial control set, analyze the initial control set to determine at least one seed set parameter, automatically code a first portion of the plurality of documents based on the initial control set and the seed set parameter associated with the identified subject or category, analyze the first portion of the plurality of documents by applying an adaptive identification cycle, and retrieve a second portion of the plurality of documents based on a result of the application of the adaptive identification cycle test on the first portion of the plurality of documents.