Electric Plug Connector Latching Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electrical connectors for motor vehicle restraint systems face a challenge in achieving both minimal dimensions and high contact and latching reliability, while also being cost-effective and structurally simple, especially when designed to withstand long periods of use in emergency situations.

Innovation Solution

The electrical connector design eliminates a secondary lock and incorporates a latching-inhibiting means that requires significant force to release, using a flexible, compression-based mechanism acting in the circumferential direction, with latching means arranged laterally and integrated into the plug-in contour, ensuring high plugging and contacting security without irreversible material changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional latching means with spring force are used, then the connector can be easily released, but the latching reliability is insufficient for long-term emergency use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching reliabilityVSAvoidrelease ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the force mechanism from spring force to compression force. The latching-inhibiting means is compressed during insertion and maintains constant compression force on the latching means, providing reliable latching without requiring easy release through spring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the secondary locking mechanism and spring-based release mechanisms from traditional connectors. Only a single latching means remains, which is held in place by the compression-based latching-inhibiting means, simplifying the structure while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If multiple latching means with secondary lock are used, then the latching security is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching securityVSAvoidconnector structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the latching means and latching-inhibiting means into an integrally formed unit. The latching-inhibiting means is formed as one piece with the plug-in contour, eliminating the need for separate secondary locking mechanisms and reducing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the secondary locking mechanism entirely, retaining only a single latching means that is sufficient when combined with the compression-based latching-inhibiting means. This reduction in components directly lowers device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional latching means are used, then the connector can be manufactured with standard components, but the manufacturing cost is higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidconnector design
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching-inhibiting means is integrally formed with the plug-in contour as a single component. This integration reduces the number of parts that need to be manufactured and assembled, simplifying the manufacturing process and reducing costs despite the innovative design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Force

If latching means are designed to act by spring force, then the release mechanism is simple, but the latching force is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelatching forceVSAvoidforce mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the force generation mechanism from spring force to compression force. The latching-inhibiting means is compressed during insertion and maintains constant compression force on the latching means, providing significantly higher and more reliable latching force without complex spring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design results in a cost-effective, space-saving connector with enhanced latching force and reliability, preventing accidental disengagement and simplifying manufacturing, while maintaining effective electrical contact and structural integrity.

Implementation Method 1

at least one latching-inhibiting means which is integrally formed in the plug-in contour and acts in the circumferential direction U of the plug-in contour, in particular by compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 2

the locking-inhibiting means is flexible, in particular made of a softer plastic material than the plastic material of the plug-in contour. Due to the flexible configuration, the compression of the locking inhibitor can take place in the circumferential direction U in a defined manner with a defined compression force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2230731B1Electric plug connector
Publication Date: 2011.07.20 AMPHENOL TUCHEL ELECTRONICS
  • EP2230731B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2230731B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The electrical connector is provided with a locking element (1) for engaging contour of a plug (11) of the connector with the plug socket. The contour is integrally formed in the circumferential direction. A retardant lock is formed partially on the locking element.