Plug Connector Housing Sealing Against Conductive Particles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing connector housings face challenges in achieving a cost-effective and efficient seal against conductive solid particles, particularly metallic chips, due to the complexity of assembly and the mismatch between the recess size and the sheathed cable cross-section, leading to inadequate protection against ingress.

Innovation Solution

The recess on the second housing part is made larger than the connecting line's cross-section, and a sword-like projection on the first housing part covers the recess upon connection, creating a small lead-through area that effectively seals the connection line, even when it's routed as individual cores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the recess width is matched to the sheathed cable cross-section, then sealing against conductive particles is improved, but assembly difficulty and friction increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing against conductive particlesVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The recess is divided into two functional zones: a wide lead-in area for easy cable insertion and a narrow sealing area for particle protection. This segmentation allows the recess to fulfill both assembly ease and sealing requirements without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The recess transitions from a two-dimensional cross-sectional match to a three-dimensional tapered structure. The width varies along the depth, providing a wide opening for assembly and a narrow bottom for sealing, effectively adding a dimensional solution to a two-dimensional problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the recess is made larger than the connecting line cross-section, then assembly is simplified and friction is reduced, but sealing against conductive particles becomes inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidsealing against conductive particles
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The recess is divided into a wide lead-in section for easy assembly and a narrow sealing section for particle protection. This segmentation allows each zone to optimize for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the recess have different width characteristics tailored to their specific functions. The lead-in area is wide to reduce friction, while the sealing area is narrow to prevent particle ingress, applying local quality variations to solve the global contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If a rubber seal is added to the recess, then sealing against conductive particles is improved, but manufacturing costs and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing against conductive particlesVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing function is extracted from a separate rubber seal component and integrated directly into the recess structure itself. The recess geometry provides the sealing action without requiring an additional sealing element, eliminating extra parts and assembly steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The recess structure serves its own sealing function through its tapered geometry. The narrow bottom section of the recess creates natural contact pressure on the cable insulation, providing sealing without external assistance from separate sealing components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If the connecting line is routed as individual cores instead of sheathed, then adaptability is improved, but the unfilled recess area increases and sealing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection flexibilityVSAvoidsealing effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The recess is segmented into a wide upper portion that accommodates the dispersed individual cores during insertion and a narrow lower portion that converges the cores for sealing. This segmentation allows individual core routing to maintain both flexibility and sealing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The recess uses three-dimensional tapering to transition from a wide opening that accepts individual cores to a narrow sealing zone. This dimensional transition allows the connector to accommodate flexible individual core routing while still achieving effective sealing at the closure point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2850700B1Plug-connector housing and plug connector
Publication Date: 2016.10.12 KOSTAL KONTAKT SYSTEME GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2850700B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2850700B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4

AI summary

There is described a plug-connector housing having a first housing part having electrical components, and a second housing part forming a housing cap, said second housing part being connectable to the first housing part, and having a recess in the second housing part, an electrical connecting line for the electrical attachment of electrical components of the first housing part being passable through said recess, wherein the first housing part has a sword-shaped structure which largely covers the recess after the second housing part has been connected to the first housing part. Also described is a plug connector having such a plug-connector housing.