Plug-in Category Management Based on User Grades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing browser plug-in management systems lack a standardized method to differentiate between useful and malicious plug-ins, often leading to the unintentional removal of useful plug-ins, as users can only determine their usefulness after installation.

Innovation Solution

A method and computing device that assign plug-ins into categories based on user-provided grades, displaying operation indications and recommended actions such as activation, prohibition, or deletion based on their category, allowing users to manage plug-ins effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a uniform standard is used to clean away plug-ins with low grades, then malicious plug-ins can be removed, but useful plug-ins may also be cleaned away

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplug-in safetyVSAvoidplug-in utility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments plug-in management into multiple categories (first category for recommended retention, second category for recommended removal, third category for neutral handling) based on grade thresholds. This segmentation allows differentiated handling of plug-ins, preventing useful ones from being removed while still eliminating malicious ones, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and utility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If users manually evaluate each plug-in after installation, then useful plug-ins can be identified, but users may not be able to determine usefulness in advance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplug-in evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent provides operation indications before users actually remove or keep plug-ins. By presenting recommended operations (retain or remove) based on automated grade evaluation, users can make informed decisions in advance without manual evaluation, saving time while maintaining accuracy through the graded assessment system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If plug-ins are removed to eliminate malicious ones, then browser security is improved, but re-installation is required when plug-ins are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrowser securityVSAvoidplug-in re-installation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where users can view operation indications and recommended operations for each plug-in based on its grade. This feedback allows users to make informed decisions about whether to remove or retain plug-ins, and if useful plug-ins are removed, users can easily re-install them through the same evaluation system, reducing the inconvenience of re-installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10050994B2Method and computing device for processing data
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US10050994B2 patent drawing
  • US10050994B2 patent drawing
  • US10050994B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for processing data, which includes: obtaining grade of a plug-in; assigning the plug-in into one of a plurality of categories according to the grade of the plug-in; and displaying at least one operation indication and recommended operation information based on the category the plug-in belongs to. A computing device for processing data is also disclosed.