Plugin-Oriented Functional Programming System for Concurrency Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional functional programming systems are inadequate for building highly concurrent systems due to complexities in asynchronous responses and exception handling, particularly when dealing with cloud services and multi-core CPUs, leading to inefficiencies and complications in thread management and state restoration.

Innovation Solution

A plugin-oriented functional programming system that enables a dual-mode software development experience, allowing for both textual and graphical authorship, which simplifies concurrency management and separates business logic from orthogonal scaling complexities, using a hybrid functional composition model that combines dot-chaining and arrayed-compose methods to automate and optimize concurrency and asynchronous operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If thread re-assignment is used during IO wait states to avoid idle threads, then resource utilization is improved, but exception handling complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidexception handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the functional programming system into distinct components: pure functions that perform computation, IO actions that handle external interactions, and a runtime system that manages thread re-assignment and exception propagation. This segmentation allows threads to be safely re-assigned during IO waits while maintaining clear exception handling boundaries through the monadic structure, where exceptions are captured and propagated through the computational context rather than requiring complex thread-state management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary runtime system and monadic structure that mediates between thread management and exception handling. The runtime system acts as an intermediary that tracks which threads are executing which functions, enabling safe re-assignment during IO waits while ensuring exceptions are properly propagated to the appropriate computational context. This intermediary layer abstracts away the complexity of direct thread-state management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If monads are used to build abstractions over moving state, then abstraction building capacity is improved, but design limitations and additional complexity are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabstraction building capacityVSAvoiddesign complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments monadic functionality into specialized, composable components rather than requiring a single general-purpose monad. Different monadic types handle different concerns (computational state, IO actions, error handling, concurrency control), and these can be composed through type transformations. This segmentation reduces design complexity by allowing developers to use only the monadic features needed for each specific problem rather than managing all monadic capabilities in a single structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal monadic framework that can handle multiple concerns through a common interface and composition mechanisms. The same monadic infrastructure supports pure computations, IO actions, error handling, and concurrent operations, allowing abstractions to be built over moving state while maintaining a consistent design pattern across different use cases rather than requiring separate mechanisms for each concern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional functional programming is used to maintain pure functions, then functional purity is preserved, but ability to build stateful abstractions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional purityVSAvoidabstraction building capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts state management and side effects into separate IO action monads and runtime system components, allowing pure functions to remain pure while building complex stateful abstractions. The pure computational logic is separated from the stateful IO operations, with the monadic structure providing a bridge that allows pure functions to compose stateful computations without contaminating the pure function definitions themselves. This extraction enables both functional purity and rich abstraction building.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces monadic structures as intermediaries between pure functions and stateful abstractions. The monad acts as a mediator that encapsulates stateful computations and side effects, allowing pure functions to interact with stateful systems through a well-defined interface without breaking functional purity. The intermediary monadic layer translates between pure functional expressions and stateful operations, enabling both concerns to coexist.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If mixed programming model with glue-logic is used to join monadic chains, then flexibility is improved, but structural knowledge and automation opportunities are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming flexibilityVSAvoidstructural knowledge availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the programming model into clearly defined monadic function units with explicit input and output contracts, replacing unstructured glue-logic with structured composition operators. Each monadic function is a self-contained unit with well-defined behavior, and composition operators provide structured ways to join these units while preserving structural knowledge. This segmentation maintains flexibility through composable units while enabling automation through the explicit structure and metadata associated with each function and composition operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12099818B2Plugin-oriented functional programming system configured with software components
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 FORESIGHT DATA SYST LLC
  • US12099818B2 patent drawing
  • US12099818B2 patent drawing
  • US12099818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computing system can be configured to perform operations in a define phase including receiving a component specification including a transformation function; inputting the component specification into a define function; receiving, as an output of the define function, the factory function; and receive data describing a second software component that satisfies the component specification of the first software component. In an assembly phase after the define phase, the computing system can input, into the factory function, the first software component and the second software component; and receiving, as an output of the factory function, the assembled software system including the first software component connected with the second software component according to the component specification of the first software component.