Plunger Lift Controller Logic for Cycle Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plunger lift systems lack a clear understanding of optimized cycle parameters, leading to inefficient operation and the need for continuous human intervention to minimize bottom hole pressure and maximize production, as existing technologies do not provide precise logic steps for achieving and maintaining an optimized state.

Innovation Solution

A set of logic steps that modify close and open trigger set points to determine the length of flow and shut-in periods, allowing the plunger lift well to operate at either Minimum-OFF or Minimum-ON conditions, or both, thereby minimizing bottom hole pressure and maximizing production, which can be integrated into existing controllers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If plunger lift systems operate without optimized cycle parameters, then the system structure remains simple, but production efficiency decreases and bottom hole pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically adjusting cycle parameters including shut-in time, flow time, plunger fall time, and pressure thresholds to optimize production. The controller modifies these parameters based on well conditions to maximize gas production while minimizing bottom hole pressure, transforming the control from fixed to dynamic optimized values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated controller logic that independently monitors well conditions, determines optimal cycle parameters, and executes control decisions without human intervention. The controller self-adjusts based on pressure sensors, flow meters, and pre-programmed optimization algorithms, eliminating the need for continuous manual operation while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If manual optimization is used, then the control logic can be simple, but continuous human intervention and training are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidcontroller logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where the controller continuously monitors well pressure, flow rate, and plunger position, compares these measurements against target parameters, and automatically adjusts cycle timing and pressure thresholds. This closed-loop feedback enables high automation by having the system self-correct based on real-time well conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control with electronic automation. The controller uses electronic sensors, processors, and actuators to substitute human operators, automatically executing complex optimization logic that would be difficult to implement manually while significantly reducing the need for human training and intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If plunger lift cycles are extended to maximize production, then production rates increase, but bottom hole pressure increases reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction rateVSAvoidbottom hole pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making cycle parameters variable rather than fixed. The controller dynamically adjusts shut-in time, flow time, and pressure thresholds based on real-time well conditions to maintain optimal bottom hole pressure while maximizing production rates. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to respond to changing reservoir pressures and well states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic action through cyclic plunger lift operations with optimized timing. The controller establishes periodic cycles of shut-in, plunger drop, flow, and afterflow phases, where each cycle duration and phase timing is precisely controlled to maximize production while managing bottom hole pressure through rhythmic pressure fluctuations rather than continuous high pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Automates the optimization process, reducing the need for human intervention and training, and maintains optimal conditions by adjusting cycle characteristics in response to changing well conditions, leading to increased efficiency and production rates.

Implementation Method 1

The well is shut in and the plunger falls to the bottom of the tubing and onto a bumper spring, seating nipple or stop near the bottom of the tubing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

After pressure in the well has built, the wellhead is opened to flow and the high pressure gas located within the well pushes the piston upward to the surface, thereby pushing the liquid on top of the plunger to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9695680B2Plunger lift optimization
Publication Date: 2017.07.04 CONOCOPHILLIPS CO
  • US9695680B2 patent drawing
  • US9695680B2 patent drawing
  • US9695680B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A logic used to auto-adjust plunger lift system parameters optimizes oil and gas well production with minimal human interaction. The auto-adjustments place and maintain the well in an optimized state wherein the well has either a Minimum-OFF time (e.g., length of time just long enough for the plunger to reach the bottom of the well), or Minimum-ON time (e.g., flowing just long enough for the plunger to reach the surface) cycle.