Particulate Matter Sampler with Flow Control and Impactor Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring and separating PM2.5 particles are inefficient in maintaining accurate air flow rates and distinguishing between particles larger and smaller than 2.5 micrometers, leading to inaccuracies in air quality analysis and source identification.

Innovation Solution

A sampler apparatus comprising an impactor assembly with a nozzle plate, impaction plate, and filter unit, coupled with a control assembly that includes flow control devices to maintain a predetermined air flow rate, effectively segregating particles by size and ensuring accurate collection of PM2.5 particles on a filter.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single filter is used for collecting particulate matter, then cost is reduced and device complexity is simplified, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to inability to separate different particle size fractions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidparticle size separation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the particle collection process into two distinct pathways: a first filter for collecting particles larger than 2.5 micrometers and a second filter for collecting PM2.5 particles. This segmentation allows simultaneous collection of different particle size fractions with a single air intake, resolving the contradiction by maintaining measurement precision while avoiding the need for multiple separate sampling devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An impactor assembly acts as an intermediary device between the air intake and the two filters. The impactor separates particles based on size using impaction principles, directing larger particles to the first filter and smaller PM2.5 particles to the second filter. This intermediary mechanism enables precise particle size separation without requiring complex multi-device setups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If high air flow rate is used for sampling, then productivity and sampling speed are improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to particle re-entrainment and deposition errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling speedVSAvoidparticle collection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The sampling system is segmented into parallel pathways with separate filters for different particle sizes. This allows high air flow rates to be maintained for productivity while each filter independently collects its designated particle fraction, preventing cross-contamination and deposition errors that would occur in a single-filter system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device replaces slow, low-flow sampling methods with a high-flow system coupled with an impactor-based mechanical separation mechanism. The impactor uses inertial impaction to separate particles at high flow rates, substituting gradual sedimentation with rapid mechanical separation that maintains both speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple filters are used for different particle size fractions, then measurement precision and source identification accuracy are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size fraction analysis accuracyVSAvoidfilter system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device merges the functions of multiple separate samplers into a single integrated system. The impactor assembly combined with two filters in parallel achieves what would otherwise require multiple independent sampling devices, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining the ability to analyze different particle size fractions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The dual-filter system with impactor provides multi-functionality by simultaneously collecting and preserving both large particles and PM2.5 particles from the same air sample. This universal collection capability enables comprehensive particle analysis, source identification, and chemical composition determination without requiring separate sampling campaigns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If flow control devices are added to maintain predetermined air flow rate, then measurement precision and reliability are improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair flow rate accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Flow control devices are integrated into the system to provide feedback on air flow rate, automatically adjusting flow to maintain predetermined rates. This feedback mechanism ensures measurement precision and reliability by compensating for variations in sampling conditions, while the automated control reduces the need for manual intervention and calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus ensures precise collection and analysis of PM2.5 particles, reducing re-entrainment and deposition errors, enabling accurate air quality assessment and source identification, while being cost-efficient by using a single filter for multiple analyses.

Implementation Method 1

an impactor assembly comprising a nozzle plate, an impaction plate, and a filter unit. The nozzle plate comprises a plurality of nozzles for channelling an air stream through the sampler apparatus. The impaction plate is adapted to collect particulate matter having size equal to or greater than a threshold size.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpaction: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

The sampler apparatus further comprises a control assembly coupled with the impactor assembly. The control assembly comprises one or more flow control devices to maintain a predetermined air-flow rate of the air stream within the sampler apparatus.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow control:

Data Source

PatentUS10782212B2Particulate matter sampler
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES
  • US10782212B2 patent drawing
  • US10782212B2 patent drawing
  • US10782212B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sampler apparatus is disclosed. The sampler apparatus comprises an impactor assembly comprising a nozzle plate, an impaction plate, and a filter unit. The nozzle plate comprises a plurality of nozzles for channelling an air stream through the sampler apparatus. The impaction plate is adapted to collect particulate matter having size equal to or greater than a threshold size. The filter unit is adapted to collect particulate matter having size less than or equal to the threshold size. The sampler apparatus further comprises a control assembly coupled with the impactor assembly. The control assembly comprises one or more flow control devices to maintain a predetermined air-flow rate of the air stream within the sampler apparatus.