3D 2D Drawing Data Discrepancy Detection via PMI Relationship Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the manufacturing industry, discrepancies often arise between three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) drawing data when design changes are made, leading to potential errors in mass-produced products if not properly synchronized, as changes in 3D data may not be reflected in 2D data or vice versa, especially in environments without access to personal computers.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that automatically detects differences between 3D and 2D drawing data by determining relationships between product manufacturing information (PMI) in both formats and identifying correspondences, allowing for correction and synchronization without user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If design changes are incorporated into three-dimensional drawing data but two-dimensional drawing data is left unchanged, then three-dimensional data is updated with latest design, but a difference is caused between three-dimensional and two-dimensional drawing data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of three-dimensional drawing dataVSAvoidsynchronization between three-dimensional and two-dimensional drawing data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects differences between 3D and 2D drawing data by comparing product manufacturing information (PMI) relationships, and provides feedback to notify users of discrepancies. This feedback mechanism ensures that design changes made in one format are identified and can be synchronized to the other format, preventing manufacturing errors while maintaining the flexibility to update either format independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If two-dimensional drawing data is corrected on manufacturing site but correction is not incorporated into three-dimensional drawing data, then two-dimensional drawing data is updated for manufacturing, but a difference is caused between three-dimensional and two-dimensional drawing data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to correct two-dimensional drawing data on manufacturing siteVSAvoidsynchronization between three-dimensional and two-dimensional drawing data
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The comparison function detects discrepancies between 3D and 2D drawing data regardless of which format is updated first. When 2D drawing data is corrected on the manufacturing site, the system automatically identifies the difference through PMI relationship comparison and notifies users, enabling timely synchronization back to the 3D data without preventing on-site corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If manual comparison between three-dimensional and two-dimensional drawing data is performed, then user can identify differences, but user effort and time are required for detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of differences between drawing dataVSAvoidtime required for manual comparison of drawing data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic comparison of 3D and 2D drawing data by extracting and comparing PMI relationships without requiring user intervention. The processor automatically determines relationships between multiple pieces of PMI in both formats, identifies correspondences, and detects differences, eliminating the need for manual user effort while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of visually comparing 3D and 2D drawings is replaced with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithmic comparison of PMI relationships. This substitution eliminates human effort and time while providing consistent, repeatable detection of differences through systematic data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240087106A1Information processing apparatus, non-transitory computer readable medium, and method
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US20240087106A1 patent drawing
  • US20240087106A1 patent drawing
  • US20240087106A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a processor configured to: determine a relationship between plural pieces of product manufacturing information included in two-dimensional drawing data and generate, on a basis of the determined relationship, first information indicating the relationship between the plural pieces of product manufacturing information; determine a relationship between a plural pieces of product manufacturing information included in three-dimensional drawing data and generate, on a basis of the determined relationship, second information indicating the relationship between the plural pieces of product manufacturing information; and detect a difference between the first information and the second information by identifying correspondence between the first information and the second information.