PMSM Field-Oriented Control With Constant Power Factor Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for controlling the Power Factor (PF) of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) rely on motor parameters that vary with operating conditions, making it challenging to maintain a constant PF independent of motor parameter variations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Field Oriented Control (FOC) system with a constant Power Factor Control (PFC) loop, which controls the required direct (d)-axis current to maintain a constant PF, independent of motor parameters such as stator resistance, inductance, and permanent magnet flux linkage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional PF control methods relying on motor parameters are used, then the control system is simple to implement, but the power factor cannot be maintained constant under varying operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstant power factor maintenanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback control system where the power factor is continuously measured and fed back to adjust the d-axis and q-axis current references. The controller compares the actual power factor with the desired value and dynamically adjusts the current commands to maintain constant PF, resolving the contradiction by using feedback to achieve reliability without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adapts to varying operating conditions by continuously updating current references based on real-time power factor measurements. The d-axis and q-axis current commands are dynamically adjusted according to the measured PF and motor speed, allowing the system to maintain constant PF across different operating points without requiring complex parameter identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If motor parameters are used for PF control, then the control approach is straightforward, but the control performance degrades when motor parameters vary with operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependence from motor parameter variationsVSAvoidpower factor measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses its own power factor measurement to automatically adjust its control parameters. The measured PF directly feeds into the calculation of current references, creating a self-regulating system that adapts to parameter variations without external intervention or complex identification algorithms, thereby achieving adaptability while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The control system changes its operating parameters (d-axis and q-axis current references) based on the measured power factor and motor speed. By dynamically adjusting these parameters according to real-time PF measurements, the system maintains accurate power factor control independent of motor parameter variations such as stator resistance and inductance changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If constant PF control is implemented, then operating efficiency is improved, but the control loop complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol loop structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distinct functional blocks: power factor measurement module, current reference calculation module, and current control module. Each block performs a specific function, making the overall complex control loop more manageable and implementable. The segmentation allows constant PF control to be achieved through modular components rather than a monolithic complex controller

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system integrates multiple functions into a unified framework: power factor measurement, current reference generation, and current control all work together in a single integrated loop. This multi-functionality approach achieves constant PF control and improved operating efficiency without requiring separate independent control loops, thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12308767B2Field oriented control of permanent magnet synchronous motor with constant power factor control loop
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 NXP USA INC
  • US12308767B2 patent drawing
  • US12308767B2 patent drawing
  • US12308767B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for Field Oriented Control (FOC) of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) with a constant Power Factor Control (PFC) Loop includes measuring a rotor position of the PMSM. A plurality of stator voltages of the PMSM is controlled with a required direct (d)-axis current, a required quadrature (q)-axis current, the rotor position and a plurality of measured stator currents of the PMSM in a three-phase stationary reference frame. The required d-axis current is determined with a required power factor, the plurality of measured stator currents transformed into two-phase stationary reference frame, the measured stator currents transformed into a rotational reference frame, and each of a required α-axis voltage and a required β-axis voltage transformed into the two-phase stationary reference frame, wherein a power factor of the PMSM is controlled to be equal to the required power factor.