Permanent Magnet Motor Control for Magnetic Saturation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor control methods, such as maximum torque per ampere and maximum torque per volt, face challenges in maintaining efficient torque and power factor at high motor loading, leading to magnetic saturation and reduced performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a combination of unity power factor control and maximum power flow control methods, which adjust d-axis and q-axis currents to maintain optimal power factor and torque delivery across varying load conditions, using a controller to manage motor currents and voltages effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If maximum torque per ampere control method is used, then torque delivery is optimized, but magnetic saturation occurs at high loadings reducing performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque deliveryVSAvoidmotor performance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control method dynamically transitions between unity power factor control and maximum power flow control based on operating conditions. At high loadings, it switches to maximum power flow control to prevent magnetic saturation, while at lower loadings it uses unity power factor control for optimal torque delivery, making the control system adaptive to varying operational states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control parameters (d-axis and q-axis current references) based on the operating point. By monitoring loading conditions and transitioning between control strategies, it adjusts the current vector orientation and magnitude to maintain optimal performance across the entire operating range, preventing magnetic saturation at high loadings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If d-axis current is increased to prevent magnetic saturation, then motor performance is maintained, but power factor deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor performanceVSAvoidpower factor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the d-axis current reference based on operating conditions. At high loadings where magnetic saturation risk exists, it increases d-axis current to maintain performance. At lower loadings, it reduces d-axis current to maintain unity power factor, making the power factor optimization conditional on the operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control strategy parameters based on loading conditions. It transitions from unity power factor control (with lower d-axis current) at light to medium loads to maximum power flow control (with higher d-axis current) at high loads, optimizing the balance between performance maintenance and power factor preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If q-axis current is increased to deliver more torque, then power output increases, but magnetic saturation is accelerated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower outputVSAvoidmagnetic saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control method dynamically adjusts q-axis current limits based on the operating point and loading conditions. At high loadings, it restricts q-axis current growth to prevent magnetic saturation, while allowing more aggressive torque production at lower loadings where the motor operates in its linear magnetic region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the torque production strategy by transitioning from maximum torque per ampere control (which allows high q-axis current) to maximum power flow control at high loadings. This parameter change limits q-axis current to prevent magnetic saturation while still delivering acceptable power output through optimized current vector orientation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures efficient torque delivery and improved power factor at high loadings, preventing magnetic saturation and maintaining motor performance by smoothly transitioning between control methods based on load conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The motor draws a three-phase variable frequency alternating current which causes a portion of the motor referred to as the 'rotor' to rotate, and the rotation of the portion of the motor produces a torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The q-axis current peaks at the same spatial location as the rotor magnetic field peaks so that a Lorentz force exists and this creates electromagnetic torque on the rotor shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

The stator phase currents are commonly transformed to the rotor frame to obtain direct and quadrature axes components (i.e., d- and q-axes components)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCoordinate transformation:

Implementation Method 4

The d-axis component of the stator phase current produces flux that adds to the main rotating field established by the rotor permanent magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 5

The q-axis component of the stator phase current interacts directly with the rotor field to produce electromagnetic torque since it is spatially located in quadrature with the main permanent rotor flux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic torque: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS8860342B2System and method for controlling a permanent magnet motor
Publication Date: 2014.10.14 CURTISS WRIGHT ELECTRO MECHANICAL CORP
  • US8860342B2 patent drawing
  • US8860342B2 patent drawing
  • US8860342B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system. The system includes a processor, a first module, a second module and a third module. The first module is communicably connected to the processor and is configured for calculating a q-axis voltage component and a d-axis voltage component. The second module is communicably connected to the processor and is configured for determining a voltage angle relative to the q-axis. The third module is communicably connected to the processor and is configured for (1) comparing the determined voltage angle to a predetermined value, (2) outputting the determined voltage angle if the determined voltage angle is less than the predetermined value, and (3) outputting the predetermined value if the predetermined value is less than the determined voltage angle.