PMSM Speed Range Identification via Friction and Load Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motor control systems for PMSMs and induction motors lack the ability to evaluate in real-time whether a new speed reference command is within a valid speed operation range, considering both motor characteristics and dynamic mechanical characteristics, leading to potential over-speeding issues due to unaccounted friction and load variations.

Innovation Solution

A speed operation range identification system that combines motor and motion models to determine maximum speeds in real-time using optimization algorithms, incorporating parameters like stator resistance, rotor flux, friction, and load, to adjust motion profile limits and ensure safe operating speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional motor control systems use fixed speed references without real-time evaluation, then the control system is simple to implement, but the system cannot account for friction and load variations leading to potential over-speeding issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed operation safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the controller continuously evaluates the mechanical system's characteristics (friction, load, inertia) and compares the desired speed reference against the determined safe operating range. This closed-loop evaluation ensures speed safety while maintaining relatively simple implementation through existing controller architectures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs preliminary determination of the mechanical system's characteristics and safe speed operation range before executing speed control commands. By pre-evaluating system parameters and establishing safe operating boundaries in advance, the system prevents over-speeding conditions without requiring complex real-time intervention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system dynamically adjusts speed limits based on real-time friction and load conditions, then the speed operation safety is improved, but the computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed operation safetyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller evaluates only the essential parameters needed to determine safe speed operation (friction, load, inertia) rather than performing complete system analysis. This partial evaluation approach provides sufficient safety assurance while minimizing computational overhead and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts speed reference parameters based on determined mechanical characteristics, transforming fixed speed commands into adaptive speed limits. This parameter modification approach enables real-time safety adaptation without requiring complex control algorithms or extensive computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system evaluates complete mechanical characteristics including friction and load, then the accuracy of speed range determination is improved, but the measurement and detection difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed range determination accuracyVSAvoidmechanical characteristics measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The controller utilizes already-available operational data from the motor control system (current, voltage, speed measurements) to infer mechanical characteristics such as friction, load, and inertia. This self-service approach enables accurate parameter determination without requiring separate measurement devices or complex detection systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses electrical parameters (current, voltage, power) as intermediary measurements to indirectly determine mechanical characteristics. By measuring electrical quantities that are easily obtainable from the motor control system and relating them to mechanical parameters through mathematical models, the system achieves accurate speed range determination without direct mechanical measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10211763B2Method for automatically identifying speed operation range in a mechanical system driven by PMSM or induction motors under friction and load condition
Publication Date: 2019.02.19 DANFOSS POWER ELECTRONICS AS
  • US10211763B2 patent drawing
  • US10211763B2 patent drawing
  • US10211763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

As speed operation range identification system for motion systems driven by permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) or induction motors leverages both characteristics of the motor as well as dynamic characteristics of the motion system—including the friction and load—to identify suitable maximum speeds for operation of the motion system in the normal speed and field weakening regions. The identification system can model both motor characteristics as well as real-time dynamics of the controlled mechanical system that may vary during operation. The system can apply an optimization algorithm to this model to determine suitable maximum speeds for operation in the normal speed and/or field weakening regions. The determined maximum speeds can be used to perform substantially real-time adjustments to motion profile limits or current reference values generated by the motor controller in order to ensure that the speed of the system remains below the determined maximum.