PMU-Based Voltage Violation Prediction in Active Distribution Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional voltage control schemes in power grids are ineffective in managing voltage imbalances caused by distributed energy sources like solar power generators, particularly due to fluctuations in solar output and bidirectional power flow, which can lead to voltage limit violations.

Innovation Solution

A neural network is trained using the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation algorithm to predict voltage fluctuations and adjust transformer tap positions or inject reactive power to maintain voltage levels, leveraging phasor measurement units (PMUs) for real-time data and controlling distributed energy sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional voltage control schemes are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but voltage limit violations occur due to distributed energy source fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage limit complianceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network predicts voltage fluctuations before they occur by analyzing historical and real-time data from PMUs. This preliminary prediction enables proactive adjustment of transformer tap positions and reactive power injection, preventing voltage limit violations before they happen rather than reacting after violations occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors voltage levels, power production, and demand through PMUs, feeding this real-time data back to the neural network. The network uses this feedback to update predictions and adjust control actions dynamically, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing grid conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time voltage monitoring and prediction is implemented, then voltage constraint violations are prevented, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage constraint complianceVSAvoidmonitoring and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network serves multiple functions simultaneously: it predicts voltage fluctuations, identifies potential constraint violations, determines optimal control actions, and coordinates multiple distributed energy sources. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single integrated solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses readily available data from existing PMUs and grid infrastructure to train and operate the neural network. It leverages historical data already present in the system and automatically adjusts control parameters without requiring external intervention or additional complex monitoring equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If distributed energy sources are integrated into the power grid, then renewable energy utilization increases, but voltage imbalances and limit violations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverenewable energy utilizationVSAvoidvoltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational parameters of distributed energy sources based on real-time grid conditions. The neural network continuously optimizes power injection levels and reactive power output of PV systems, allowing maximum renewable utilization while adapting to changing load demands and preventing voltage instability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network modifies operational parameters of distributed energy sources, including active power injection, reactive power output, and transformer tap positions. By dynamically changing these parameters based on predicted voltage fluctuations, the system maintains voltage stability while maximizing renewable energy integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240088670A1Intelligent voltage limit violation prediction and mitigation for active distribution networks
Publication Date: 2024.03.14 HAMAD BIN KHALIFA UNIVERSITY
  • US20240088670A1 patent drawing
  • US20240088670A1 patent drawing
  • US20240088670A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Intelligent voltage limit violation prediction and mitigation for active distribution networks may be provided by: measuring, at one or more of a plurality of phasor measurement units (PMUs) connected between a power grid and associated loads, a present power produced by photovoltaic systems deployed downstream from the one or more of the plurality of PMUs; measuring, at the one or more of the plurality of PMUs, a present demand for power from the associated loads; generating a power production prediction by the photovoltaic systems for an upcoming time period; generating a demand prediction for power from the loads for the upcoming time period; and taking a mitigation action based on the power production prediction and the demand prediction indicating a predicted voltage constraint violation in the upcoming time period.