Pneumatic Amplifier Feedback Chambers for Fast Mode Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pneumatic amplifiers face challenges in switching between single-acting and double-acting modes, requiring manual adjustments and suffering from high friction and hysteresis due to O-ring sealing, leading to long response times and interference between output pressures.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates three independent comparison chambers with internal feedback amplification using a nozzle and baffle, allowing for synchronous and fast responses in both positive and negative actions, eliminating the need for manual adjustments and reducing diaphragm movement distances, thereby enhancing sensitivity and repeatability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If O-ring sealing is used for valve stem sealing, then sealing reliability is improved, but friction force increases resulting in long response time and serious hysteresis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the O-ring sealing element from the valve stem sealing system and replaces it with a contactless magnetic coupling mechanism. The magnetic coupling transfers rotational motion from the drive shaft to the valve core without physical contact, eliminating the O-ring and its associated friction and hysteresis while maintaining sealing integrity through the magnetic field barrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical O-ring sealing system with a magnetic coupling system. The magnetic field transfers torque through a non-contact interface, substituting mechanical contact with magnetic interaction, thereby eliminating friction-based losses while maintaining the sealing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If conventional double-acting amplifier structure is used, then output pressure difference control is achieved, but output pressure control is not achieved and manual adjustment is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput pressure difference controlVSAvoidmanual adjustment requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a feedback mechanism where the actual output pressure is sensed and fed back to the control system. This feedback loop allows the controller to automatically adjust the valve positioning to achieve the desired output pressure, eliminating the need for manual adjustment screws and enabling precise pressure control while maintaining pressure difference control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If adjusting screws are added to control output pressure, then output pressure control is achieved, but device complexity increases and output interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput pressure controlVSAvoidadjusting screw structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical adjusting screw system with an electronic control system that uses magnetic coupling and feedback control. The electronic system calculates and adjusts valve positioning dynamically, eliminating the need for physical adjusting screws and reducing mechanical complexity while improving control precision and eliminating output interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If valve core mounting base is moved for single-acting mode, then single-acting operation is achieved, but re-adjustment is required and adaptability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle-acting mode operationVSAvoidre-adjustment requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control system that can adapt to both single-acting and double-acting modes through software control of the magnetic coupling mechanism. The system dynamically adjusts its operation mode based on input signals, eliminating the need for physical reconfiguration or re-adjustment of the valve core mounting base, thereby maintaining versatility while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enables independent control of valve core movements, achieving amplification of output pressure and flow rate without interference between modes, simplifying adjustments and reducing response time, resulting in a more sensitive and reliable pneumatic amplifier.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure difference generating device is arranged in the valve body; a pressure difference generating cavity is formed between the nozzle and the baffle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure difference: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

When the control pressure Pn is changed, a diaphragm 107 is forced to change to drive a valve stem 111 to move

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10955063B2Pneumatic amplifier
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 MERCURY INSTR CHENGDU CORP
  • US10955063B2 patent drawing
  • US10955063B2 patent drawing
  • US10955063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pneumatic amplifier includes a valve body, a first comparison chamber, a third comparison chamber and a second comparison chamber. A first diaphragm and a second diaphragm are arranged in the first comparison chamber and fixed to the valve body. A mounting plate A is fixedly arranged between the first diaphragm and the second diaphragm. A seventh diaphragm, an eighth diaphragm, a ninth diaphragm and a tenth diaphragm are arranged in the second comparison chamber and fixedly arranged on the valve body. A mounting plate C is fixedly arranged among the seventh diaphragm, the eighth diaphragm, the ninth diaphragm and the tenth diaphragm. A third diaphragm, a fourth diaphragm, a fifth diaphragm and a sixth diaphragm are arranged in the third comparison chamber and fixed to the valve body. A mounting plate B is fixedly arranged among the third diaphragm, the fourth diaphragm, the fifth diaphragm and the sixth diaphragm.