Handheld Pneumatic Compaction Device for Composite Laminates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current compaction techniques for composite materials, such as Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) parts, are time-consuming and labor-intensive due to the need for sealing vacuum bags, which hampers efficient processing of small laminates.

Innovation Solution

A handheld pneumatic and/or electromagnetic compaction device that grips a mandrel using magnetic forces and applies pneumatic pressure to compact laminates without a vacuum bag, maintaining static equilibrium between gripping and compressive forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If vacuum bag sealing is used for compaction, then compaction pressure can be applied to the laminate, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction pressureVSAvoidsealing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the vacuum bag sealing step from the traditional compaction process. Instead of using a vacuum bag that requires time-consuming sealing operations, the invention applies compaction pressure directly to the laminate through a simplified mechanism, removing the problematic sealing step entirely while maintaining effective compaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The compaction process is segmented into discrete, quickly-executable steps. Rather than a continuous vacuum sealing process, the invention uses separate, rapid positioning and pressing actions that can be performed in quick succession, significantly reducing the overall time required for the compaction operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stress or pressure

If vacuum bag sealing is used for compaction, then the laminate can be compacted, but the process becomes labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction pressureVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex vacuum bag sealing operation from the process, replacing it with a simple direct-pressure application method. This extraction of the problematic sealing step dramatically simplifies the operational procedure, making the compaction process less labor-intensive and easier to perform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using suction (vacuum) to achieve compaction, the invention inverts the approach by applying direct positive pressure to the laminate. This inversion eliminates the need for sealing operations and creates a simpler, more straightforward pressing action that is easier to perform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Stress or pressure

If traditional vacuum bag method is used, then compaction can be achieved, but it is not suitable for complex geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompaction pressureVSAvoidgeometry adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using a pressure application mechanism that can be customized or adjusted for different geometric regions of the laminate. The pressing surface or tooling can be shaped to match specific geometric features, allowing effective compaction of complex geometries that would be difficult to accommodate with a universal vacuum bag approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces labor and time required for compacting small laminates, enabling faster and more efficient processing of composite parts by eliminating the need for vacuum bag sealing and allowing for compacting of complex geometries.

Implementation Method 1

grip a mandrel or other forming tool via the application of magnetic force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

shape a laminate onto the mandrel by applying pneumatic pressure to the laminate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11667063B2Composite part compaction device
Publication Date: 2023.06.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US11667063B2 patent drawing
  • US11667063B2 patent drawing
  • US11667063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for compacting laminates. One embodiment is a method for compacting a laminate onto a surface of a forming tool. The method includes placing the laminate onto the forming tool, disposing a compaction device over the laminate, gripping the compaction device to the forming tool, compacting the laminate with a pressure foot of the compaction device, and removing the compaction device from the forming tool.