Pneumatic Infusion Pump Control with Pressure-Based Air Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid flow control systems in medical devices face challenges such as wide flow rate and viscosity ranges, gas presence, varying patient pressures, and tubing configurations, leading to reliability issues, complexity, and air bubble detection inaccuracies, which affect patient safety and caregiver workflow.

Innovation Solution

A pneumatically coupled direct drive system with a linear actuator and closed-loop control, using a gas reservoir and flexible membrane to maintain precise fluid delivery, coupled with an air detection and elimination mechanism to prevent air bubbles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional fluid control mechanisms are used, then broad flow rate range and wide ranging fluid viscosity are supported, but reliability deteriorates and complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate rangeVSAvoidproduct performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a compliance chamber as an intermediary element between the pump mechanism and the fluid delivery system. This compliance chamber absorbs pressure variations and decouples the pump's mechanical actions from the fluid flow, thereby improving reliability while maintaining adaptability across different flow rates and viscosities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters such as pump cycle duration, stroke volume, and pressure thresholds based on detected fluid properties and flow rate requirements. This allows the pump to maintain reliable operation across a broad range of conditions without requiring complex mechanical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If sophisticated fluid control systems are added, then flow accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases and maintenance costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism using a pressure sensor that monitors the compliance chamber pressure and adjusts pump operation accordingly. This closed-loop control achieves accurate flow measurement and control while keeping the overall system relatively simple, as the feedback is used to modulate a basic peristaltic pump rather than requiring a completely complex pumping mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical flow measurement and control mechanisms with a simpler approach: a basic peristaltic pump combined with pressure sensing and computational control. The flow accuracy is achieved through software-based flow calculation from pressure data and pump kinematics rather than through complex mechanical flow meters or regulators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If air detection mechanisms are added, then patient safety is improved, but false alarms increase and workflow is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair bubble detectionVSAvoiddetection specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance chamber serves as an intermediary that allows air bubbles to be trapped and managed separately from the main fluid delivery path. The pressure sensor monitors the chamber for air presence, and the system can pause or adjust pumping to allow bubbles to rise and escape through designated vent paths, reducing false alarms while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its air detection and response behavior based on operational context. Rather than using a fixed threshold that causes false alarms, the system adapts its detection criteria and response strategies based on flow rate, pump cycle phase, and pressure trends, thereby improving detection specificity while maintaining sensitivity to real air bubble hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If peristaltic pump mechanism is used, then simple tubing configuration is achieved, but harmful high fluid pressure is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetubing configurationVSAvoidfluid pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance chamber acts as a pressure buffer and decoupling element between the peristaltic pump and the patient line. It absorbs the high pressure pulses generated by the peristaltic rollers, smoothing out pressure variations before fluid enters the patient line, thereby maintaining simple tubing configuration while eliminating harmful pressure spikes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance chamber is positioned upstream in the fluid path to cushion and dampen pressure variations before they reach the patient line. This preemptive pressure smoothing prevents harmful high pressures from being transmitted to the patient while allowing the peristaltic pump to operate with its simple, effective roller mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures reliable, accurate fluid delivery with reduced complexity, minimizes air bubbles, and enhances patient safety by improving detection specificity and reducing false alarms, thus optimizing caregiver workflow.

Implementation Method 1

A pneumatic drive is provided that is coupled to the gas side chamber to effect known incremental positive or negative volume changes that in turn cause positive or negative pressure changes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure transmission: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

The pressure changes are communicated to the fluid side chamber through the flexible membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexible membrane pressure transmission: Pascal's Law

Implementation Method 3

A passive inlet check valve and an outlet check valve are provided that open in response to pressure changes in the fluid to create a unidirectional pumping action

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential valve operation: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 4

A pressure sensor in the gas reservoir senses the gas pressure therein

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP4108270B1Infusion device
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 NEWIV MEDICAL CORP
  • EP4108270B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4108270B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4108270B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A process for controlling an infusion of fluid from a fluid source to a liquid sink, comprising: a) exerting a negative pressure on a gas reservoir in fluid communication with a gas-side chamber separated from a fluid-side chamber by a flexible membrane to draw liquid from the fluid source into the fluid-side chamber through a one-way inlet valve until the fluid-side chamber fills with fluid; b) exerting a positive pressure on the gas reservoir in fluid communication with the gas-side chamber to deliver liquid in the fluid-side chamber to the liquid sink through a one-way outlet valve; c) monitoring pressure in the gas reservoir during the steps of exerting the negative pressure and exerting the positive pressure; and d) determining volumes of fluid in the fluid-side chamber from incremental changes in volume of the gas reservoir and the gas-side chamber and any connecting dead space by an ideal gas law relationship, wherein P1 V1 = P2 V2 , wherein P1 and P2 are pressures measured at two times before and after volume changes and V1 and V2 are volumes at the two times.