Pneumatic Leak Diagnosis Using Pressure Decay Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current diagnostic systems for pneumatic systems, such as patient support surfaces, lack effective methods to detect leaks efficiently, which can lead to reduced system performance and lifespan due to undetected micro-leaks or imminent failures.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic system that pressurizes, measures, and compares the pneumatic system's inflation and decay times to stored values, using a control system and software to determine if the system is functioning within acceptable parameters, thereby identifying leaks and predicting component lifespan.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current diagnostic systems are used for pneumatic systems, then the system structure remains simple, but leak detection capability is insufficient leading to reduced system performance and lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection capabilityVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system segments the pneumatic system into multiple zones with individual bladders, allowing independent monitoring of each segment. This enables localized leak detection without requiring complex system-wide diagnostics, improving reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through modular measurement approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical leak detection methods with electronic pressure sensing and computational analysis. By using electronic sensors to measure pressure decay rates and comparing them against stored reference values, the system achieves superior leak detection capability without proportionally increasing mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If micro-leaks are not detected, then the diagnostic method remains simple, but system performance and lifespan are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performance and lifespanVSAvoidmicro-leak detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors pressure decay and provides feedback by comparing measured decay rates against stored reference values. This feedback mechanism enables detection of subtle micro-leaks that would otherwise be undetectable, improving system reliability through continuous diagnostic evaluation rather than simple presence/absence detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects micro-leaks by measuring changes in pressure decay rate parameters over time. By monitoring the rate of pressure change rather than just static pressure values, the system can identify subtle leaks that cause gradual parameter changes, overcoming the difficulty of detecting small leakage rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If inflation and decay times are measured and compared to stored values, then leak detection accuracy is improved, but measurement and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak detection accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic measurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-storing reference inflation and decay time values during system setup. During actual diagnostics, the system only needs to measure current performance and compare against pre-established benchmarks, improving leak detection accuracy while minimizing the time required for actual measurement and processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by comparing measured inflation/decay times against stored reference parameters. This approach enables accurate leak detection by identifying deviations from normal parameter ranges without requiring complex real-time analysis, balancing measurement precision with acceptable diagnostic time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively detects leaks and predicts component lifespan by comparing measured parameters to stored values, enabling timely maintenance and reducing downtime.

Implementation Method 1

pressurizing the system to an inflation pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

measuring a decayed pressure after the settling-in time period

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS10267706B2Pneumatic diagnostic method and system for detecting leakage in a pneumatic system
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 STRYKER CORP
  • US10267706B2 patent drawing
  • US10267706B2 patent drawing
  • US10267706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of diagnosing a pneumatic system that (1) pressurizes the system to a first inflation pressure, (2) ceases the pressurizing for a settling-in time period, (3) measures a settled-in pressure after the settling-in time period, (4) measures a decayed pressure after a decay time period, (5) determines a determined rate of decay of the pressure in the system over the decay time period, and (6) compares the determined rate of decay to a first stored decay rate.