Pneumatic Load Balancing Control With Automatic Pressure Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing load balancing systems lack accuracy, speed, and user-friendliness in controlling pneumatic hoists, requiring manual adjustment of air pressure for load balancing and lacking robustness in detecting accidents.

Innovation Solution

A pneumatic load balancing system with a pressure sensor and controller that automatically sets the air pressure in the actuating cylinder based on pressure and position sensors, detecting accidents by monitoring valve activity and position, and applying predetermined valve settings to prevent accidents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual pressure adjustment is used for load balancing, then the system is simple to operate, but the accuracy and speed of balancing are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalancing pressure accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines the balancing pressure by monitoring the pressure sensor data and valve activity without requiring manual intervention. The controller autonomously identifies when the load is balanced by detecting the stabilization of pressure readings, eliminating the need for operator judgment and achieving self-service operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the pressure in the actuating cylinder chamber using a pressure sensor and uses this feedback information to determine when balancing pressure has been achieved. The controller analyzes the pressure readings over time and detects the point where pressure stabilization indicates proper balancing, enabling precise automatic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automatic pressure determination is implemented, then the balancing accuracy and speed improve, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebalancing speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously receives feedback from the pressure sensor monitoring the chamber pressure and automatically determines when balancing pressure is achieved by detecting pressure stabilization. This feedback mechanism enables rapid automatic balancing without manual intervention, significantly improving productivity while using standard control components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical pressure adjustment with an automated electronic control system that uses pressure sensor data and controller logic to determine balancing pressure. This substitution of mechanical manual operation with electronic automation increases balancing speed while keeping the hardware complexity manageable through software-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If manual pressure setting is used, then the system is easier to manufacture, but it lacks safety features for accident detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem component count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses continuous feedback from the pressure sensor and valve activity monitoring to detect abnormal conditions indicating accidents. The controller analyzes this feedback data to identify situations such as sudden pressure changes or unexpected valve behavior that signal safety issues, enabling automatic accident detection without adding extensive safety hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The pressure sensor and controller serve multiple functions: they not only determine the balancing pressure for normal operation but also detect accident conditions by monitoring pressure patterns and valve activity. This multi-functionality enhances safety and reliability without requiring separate dedicated safety components, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If automated control with pressure sensing is used, then user-friendliness improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-friendlinessVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic pressure determination and balancing without requiring user expertise or manual adjustment. The controller autonomously monitors pressure sensor readings, analyzes valve activity, and determines when balancing pressure is achieved, making the system user-friendly by eliminating complex manual procedures while using standard automated control components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate, automated load balancing with reduced manual intervention and enhanced safety by preventing accidents through automatic pressure adjustment and responsive valve control.

Implementation Method 1

a pressure sensor for determining the pressure in a chamber of the actuating cylinder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 2

controlling the air pressure in the chamber of the actuating cylinder... determining a balancing air pressure in the chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS12565407B2Pneumatic load balancing system and method
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 STACCATO TECH AB
  • US12565407B2 patent drawing
  • US12565407B2 patent drawing
  • US12565407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pneumatic load balancing system comprises a pressure sensor for determining the pressure in a chamber of the actuating cylinder, and a controller for controlling the air pressure in the chamber of the actuating cylinder via at least one air supply valve. The controller is configured to during a load balancing sequence continuously or periodically obtain a current air pressure in the chamber from the pressure sensor when supplying air to the chamber via said at least one air supply and to determine a balancing air pressure in the chamber when, if air fed to the chamber, the air pressure stops increasing or when the gradient of the pressure increase is below a pre-determined threshold value; or if the air pressure is let out from the chamber, the air pressure starts to decrease. The balancing air pressure thus determined is then used as the balancing air pressure for the actuating cylinder of the pneumatic load balancing system. Hereby an automatic setting of the air pressure required for load balancing can be achieved. The user does then not need to manually feed the required air-pressure and the system will use the correct air-pressure and mistakes in setting of the air pressure can be avoided.