Pneumatic Water Pipe Inspection Robot for Debris-Tolerant Traversal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for water pipe inspection are inefficient, pose health risks to humans, and are prone to inaccurate data collection due to rigid robots and debris buildup, which can damage locomotion mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A water pipe inspection robot utilizing inflatable actuators that traverse pipes with a pneumatic system to adjust pressures, allowing for flexible movement and debris clearance, with a locomotion cycle that includes inflation and deflation states of actuators to navigate and extend within pipes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid components are used in pipe inspection robots, then structural strength is improved, but flexibility and adaptability to pipe deformations deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robot employs a soft body structure composed of flexible materials that can deform and adapt to the internal geometry of pipes. The body includes multiple articulated segments that can bend and flex, allowing the robot to navigate curved and irregular pipe sections while maintaining structural integrity through distributed compliance rather than rigid components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The robot utilizes dynamic locomotion mechanisms with movable joints and articulations that allow real-time adaptation to pipe geometry. The body segments can dynamically adjust their configuration through actuated joints, enabling the robot to navigate complex pipe networks while maintaining contact and stability throughout the inspection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Force

If traditional locomotion mechanisms are used, then propulsion capability is improved, but susceptibility to debris damage and maintenance needs worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropulsion capabilityVSAvoidresistance to debris damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot employs pneumatic actuators for locomotion, using compressed air to drive soft artificial muscles that propel the robot forward. This pneumatic system replaces traditional mechanical drive trains, eliminating exposed gears, belts, and other debris-sensitive components while maintaining effective propulsion capability through pressure-driven motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The soft body structure protects internal pneumatic components from debris damage while allowing controlled deformation for locomotion. The flexible exterior acts as a protective envelope that absorbs impacts and prevents debris from reaching sensitive internal systems, significantly improving reliability in harsh pipe environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Adaptability or versatility

If inflatable actuators are used, then flexibility and adaptability are improved, but control precision and pressure management complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidpressure management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot's body is divided into multiple discrete inflatable segments or artificial muscles, each capable of independent actuation. This segmentation allows distributed control of different body regions, enabling precise local deformations while the overall system maintains flexibility. Each segment can be controlled independently, simplifying the control architecture compared to a single complex actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robot incorporates pressure sensors and feedback control mechanisms that monitor the state of inflatable actuators and adjust air pressure accordingly. This closed-loop control system maintains precise positioning and deformation control while automatically compensating for pressure variations, eliminating the need for complex manual pressure management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The robot achieves efficient and flexible pipe traversal, reduces debris impact, and provides accurate data collection while minimizing maintenance needs, enhancing safety and inspection efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A water pipe inspection robot utilizes inflatable actuators that traverse pipes with a pneumatic system to adjust pressures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentUS11209114B2Water pipe inspection robot and method of traversing a water pipe
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US11209114B2 patent drawing
  • US11209114B2 patent drawing
  • US11209114B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for traversing a conduit includes a body having a first member that is receivable within a second member. The first member is slidable relative to the second member. A first actuator is coupled to a first end of the body. A second actuator is coupled to a second end of the body. A third actuator is coupled to the body between the first actuator and the second actuator. The third actuator is also spaced apart from the first actuator and the second actuator. The device also includes a pneumatic system that is configured to change the pressure of the actuators.