Pneumatic Piston Venting with Multi-Stage Flow Resistance Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pneumatic actuators face challenges in achieving smooth and shock-free braking of a piston due to complex valve arrangements and varying external forces, making it difficult to maintain optimal movement patterns across different loads and orientations.

Innovation Solution

A pneumatic device with a line network designed to provide adjustable flow resistances in multiple stages or continuously, allowing for precise control of piston movement by varying the connection to outflow openings through check valves and directional control valves, independent of piston position or external forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a damping throttle with pressure-dependent flow cross-section is used to control piston movement, then the piston deceleration can be controlled, but the device complexity increases and optimal coordination cannot be achieved for all operating situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston movement controlVSAvoidvalve arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust path is segmented into multiple parallel line branches (first line branch, second line branch, third line branch) each with different flow resistances. This segmentation allows the system to provide multiple discrete flow resistance options without requiring a complex continuously adjustable throttle, thereby simplifying the overall device structure while maintaining control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different flow resistance configurations by opening or closing specific shut-off valves in different line branches. This dynamic reconfiguration allows optimal coordination for varying operating conditions (different loads, orientations) without requiring a permanently complex adjustable mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a fixed flow resistance is used for venting the chamber, then the device structure is simplified, but the control precision of piston position and movement is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline network structureVSAvoidpiston position control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust system is divided into multiple parallel line branches with different flow resistances. This segmentation provides multiple discrete control options that enable precise piston position control without requiring a single complex continuously adjustable component, thus maintaining structural simplicity while improving control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the flow resistance parameter by switching between different line branches with predetermined flow resistance values. This discrete parameter change approach provides sufficient control precision for various operating conditions without the complexity of continuous adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the flow resistance is adjusted to control piston braking, then the piston movement control is improved, but the adjustment must be adapted to each operating condition which increases operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston movement precisionVSAvoidoperational adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple line branches with different flow resistances are pre-configured in the system during design and manufacturing. This preliminary preparation of various flow resistance options eliminates the need for complex real-time adjustments during operation, as the control system can simply switch between pre-configured options based on operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device automatically selects and switches between different line branches based on sensor feedback about piston position, speed, and operating conditions. This self-service capability eliminates manual intervention for adapting to different operating conditions, maintaining operational simplicity while achieving precise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple line branches with different flow resistances are used, then the piston control is improved for different operating states, but the line network structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating state adaptabilityVSAvoidline network configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust system is segmented into multiple parallel line branches, each with a simple predetermined flow resistance. This segmentation provides operating state adaptability through simple parallel pathways rather than a single complex adjustable path, actually reducing overall structural complexity while improving versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple line branches serve universal exhaust functions but with different flow resistance characteristics. This multi-functionality approach allows a single exhaust system to handle various operating conditions (different loads, speeds, orientations) without requiring separate specialized systems for each condition, thus improving adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise control of piston position and movement patterns, independent of external forces and orientations, by adjusting flow resistances, resulting in smoother braking and acceleration of the piston.

Implementation Method 1

the line network is designed such that in at least three of the operating states serving to vent the respective chamber, the connection of the respective chamber to the outflow opening or the respective selected outflow opening takes place with mutually different flow resistances

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow resistance:

Data Source

PatentEP4414562A1Pneumatic device with a movably mounted piston
Publication Date: 2024.08.14 AFAG HLDG AG
  • EP4414562A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4414562A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4414562A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Pneumatic device comprising a pneumatic cylinder (5) and a piston (6) movably mounted in the pneumatic cylinder (5), by which an interior space of the pneumatic cylinder (5) is divided into two chambers (7, 8), wherein the chambers (7, 8) are connected to a line network (10) of the pneumatic device (1-4) comprising a valve arrangement (9), wherein the line network (10) is configured to connect the respective chamber (7, 8) to an outlet opening (11-13) or at least one selected outlet opening (11-13) of the pneumatic device (1-4) in several operating states of the valve arrangement (9) serving to vent the respective chamber (7, 8) and to disconnect it from the outlet opening (11-13) or all outlet openings (11-13) in at least one further operating state of the valve arrangement (9), wherein a control device (14) of the pneumatic device (1-4) is designed to adjust the operating state of the valve arrangement (9),wherein the piping network (10) is designed such that in at least three of the operating states serving to vent the respective chamber (7, 8), the connection of the respective chamber (7, 8) to the outlet opening (11-13) or the respective selected outlet opening (11-13) is made with different flow resistances.