Pneumatic Ring Oscillator Circuits for Electronics-Free Soft Robot Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluidic soft robots require complex and costly electronic components for actuation and control, limiting their size and autonomy, especially in environments sensitive to spark ignition or where electronics are not feasible.

Innovation Solution

The development of fluidic circuits using soft ring oscillators and bistable valves allows for electronics-free control of soft robots, enabling rhythmic motions and adaptive gaits through pneumatic or hydraulic actuation, with onboard sensors for semi-autonomous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electronic components (solenoid valves, microcontrollers) are used to control soft robots, then actuation precision and control capability are improved, but device size increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation precisionVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces electronic control components with a purely pneumatic control system. Ring oscillators and bistable valves use pneumatic pressure waves and fluid dynamics to generate rhythmic actuation patterns, eliminating the need for microcontrollers and electronic solenoid valves. This mechanical-pneumatic substitution reduces device size while maintaining actuation precision through the inherent oscillatory behavior of the pneumatic circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a pneumatic control system where ring oscillators generate pressure waves that sequentially activate chambers in soft actuators. Bistable valves use pneumatic pressure to switch between two stable states, controlling the direction of actuation. This pneumatic approach eliminates electronic components, reducing device size and cost while achieving precise rhythmic control through fluid dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Adaptability or versatility

If electronic components are used for control, then control capability is improved, but reliability in spark-sensitive environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol capabilityVSAvoidsafety in spark-sensitive environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces all electronic control components with pneumatic mechanisms. Ring oscillators generate control signals through pneumatic pressure waves, and bistable valves respond to pressure changes without electronic sensors or actuators. This eliminates spark generation entirely, ensuring safety in environments sensitive to ignition while maintaining full control capability through pneumatic signal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an inherently safe control system by using pneumatic pressure waves in an inert-like manner - pressure signals are transmitted through fluid channels without electrical energy that could cause sparks. The entire control circuit operates using compressed gas, making the system intrinsically safe for use in environments where electronic components would pose a fire or explosion hazard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Measurement precision

If multiple hard valves are used for temporally coordinated actuation, then control precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemporal control precisionVSAvoidvalve quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service control where the pneumatic system generates its own control signals through ring oscillators. The oscillators automatically produce rhythmic pressure waves that sequentially activate chambers without external electronic control. This self-generated control reduces the need for multiple external valves and controllers, simplifying the system while maintaining precise temporal coordination through the inherent oscillatory mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces ring oscillators as intermediary pneumatic components that mediate between the pressure source and the actuators. These oscillators convert continuous pneumatic pressure into rhythmic, temporally coordinated pressure waves that automatically sequence chamber activation. This intermediary mechanism eliminates the need for multiple electronic valves and microcontrollers, reducing device complexity while achieving precise temporal control through fluid dynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If a single pneumatic signal is used for actuation, then device simplicity is improved, but adaptability for different gaits deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signal quantityVSAvoidgait switching capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptability where a single pneumatic signal is processed by ring oscillators to generate multiple rhythmic patterns. By adjusting the oscillation frequency and phase relationships within the pneumatic circuit, the system can produce different gait patterns (walking, running, trotting) from the same basic control input. This dynamic processing allows gait switching without requiring multiple independent control signals or complex electronic controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves gait variability by changing parameters within the pneumatic control system - specifically, the frequency, amplitude, and phase of pressure waves generated by ring oscillators. By modulating these pneumatic parameters, the system can produce different actuation patterns and gaits from a single pneumatic source, providing adaptability without increasing device complexity or requiring multiple control signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables soft robots to navigate and interact with environments without electronics, reducing size and cost constraints, and allowing for adaptive locomotion and obstacle avoidance with improved efficiency and safety in sensitive environments.

Implementation Method 1

employing a soft ring oscillator with soft valves to generate rhythmic motions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic oscillation: Harmonic Oscillator

Implementation Method 2

fluidic circuits using soft ring oscillators and bistable valves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBistability: Metastability

Implementation Method 3

Fluid-driven soft actuators function by pressurizing elastomeric channels and chambers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11994152B2Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling a robot
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US11994152B2 patent drawing
  • US11994152B2 patent drawing
  • US11994152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pneumatic circuit for controlling the activation of a robot with inflatable chambers includes at least one ring oscillator formed from a plurality of valves connected in series to selectively admit fluid pressure to inflate and deflate the chambers. Sequential actuation of the valves induces sequential bending and rotation of combinations of the chambers to effect motion. A switching valve changes the actuation sequence of the oscillator valves to change the direction of motion.