Compact Pneumatic Shingle Remover with Automatic Trigger

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing power tools for removing roof shingles are heavy, difficult to maneuver, and pose safety risks due to their weight and bulky size, especially on steep-pitched roofs, and lack efficient leverage and automatic triggering mechanisms, leading to increased operator effort and time consumption.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight and compact power tool design featuring a small piston with quick charging time and a powertrain with mechanical advantage, along with an automatic actuation mechanism triggered by contact with shingles, allowing for easier and safer operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a pneumatic actuator with large piston is used to provide sufficient force for shingle removal, then the actuating force is improved, but the device weight and size increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuating forceVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into separate functional modules: a lightweight frame, a compact pneumatic actuator, a lever mechanism, and a shingle engagement assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, using a small piston actuator combined with mechanical leverage rather than relying on a single large actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lever arm is designed with a curved geometry that provides mechanical advantage through a pivot point. The curved lever arm converts the linear motion from the small piston into amplified rotational motion, effectively multiplying the force output without requiring a larger piston.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Force

If a heavy device is used to ensure sufficient power for shingle removal, then the actuating force is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in maneuvering and carrying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuating forceVSAvoidease of maneuvering
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses a lightweight aluminum alloy frame segmented into multiple components that can be easily assembled and disassembled. The separation of the actuator, lever mechanism, and engagement assembly allows for reduced overall weight while maintaining functional integrity, making the device easier to carry and maneuver on rooftops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design incorporates a balanced lever mechanism where the pivot point is positioned to create counterbalancing moments. This mechanical counterweight effect reduces the perceived weight of the device during operation, making it easier to control and maneuver despite the presence of the actuator and engagement components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Force

If a heavy device with large actuator is used, then the actuating force is improved, but the productivity deteriorates due to slow actuator charging time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuating forceVSAvoidactuator charging speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pneumatic system is segmented into a compact air tank and a small piston actuator. This segmentation allows the air tank to be sized for portable duration rather than power, enabling faster recharge cycles. The small piston requires less air volume to operate, significantly reducing the time needed to repressurize and ready the actuator for the next cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs periodic action through a reusable air tank that can be quickly repressurized. Rather than continuous operation, the system uses intermittent pneumatic bursts triggered by the lever mechanism, allowing the air tank to be rapidly recharged between cycles and maintaining high productivity through rapid repeat operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Force

If a bulky device is used to provide sufficient mechanical advantage, then the actuating force is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in carrying and deploying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuating forceVSAvoidease of carrying and deploying
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into a lightweight frame structure, a compact actuator assembly, and a separate engagement mechanism. This segmentation reduces the overall bulk while maintaining the mechanical advantage needed for shingle removal. The modular design allows the device to be collapsed or disassembled for easier transport and deployment to rooftop locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lever mechanism introduces a rotational dimension to the linear motion of the piston. This dimensional transformation allows the small piston to generate sufficient force through mechanical leverage, eliminating the need for a bulky actuator while maintaining the required actuating force for shingle removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool reduces user effort and time required for shingle removal, enhances safety by preventing accidental triggering, and improves maneuverability on rooftops, making it easier to transport and use on steep-pitched roofs.

Implementation Method 1

This device uses pneumatic pressure to lift the shingles from the roof deck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

a powertrain with mechanical advantage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS12098552B2Power tool system and method for removing roof shingles
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 JOHNSON THOMAS MERLE
  • US12098552B2 patent drawing
  • US12098552B2 patent drawing
  • US12098552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for removing shingles from a roof with an automatic triggering of power to a fastener engaging member which is accomplished with the aid of relative movement occurring when a leading edge of the system encounters a fastener coupled to a substrate with shingle coupled thereto.