Pneumatic Inspection of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Interconnects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for inspecting solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) require high-temperature heat treatment, which increases costs and cycle time, and are cumbersome due to the need for non-destructive electrochemical testing and imaging techniques.

Innovation Solution

A method involving pneumatic quality control, where a fluid is applied with a pneumatic constraint to determine quality control parameters and assess the health of assembled SOFC portions, including metallic interconnects with flow fields, without the need for high-temperature treatment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If non-destructive electrochemical testing methods are used to inspect SOFCs, then detection of defects is possible, but high temperature testing configurations and seals are required which increase cost and cycle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electrochemical testing systems with simple pneumatic pressure testing. Instead of using electrochemical cells requiring high temperature configurations, the invention uses pneumatic pressure applied to the flow fields to detect defects, eliminating the need for high temperature testing equipment and seals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the testing parameter from electrochemical measurements at high temperature to pneumatic pressure measurements at ambient or elevated temperatures. This parameter change allows defect detection without requiring high temperature conditions, thereby reducing cycle time and equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If high temperature heat treatment is applied prior to detection, then defect detection accuracy is improved, but manufacturing cost and cycle time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal processing with pneumatic testing. Instead of applying high temperature heat treatment to prepare the SOFC for inspection, the invention directly applies pneumatic pressure to the flow fields to detect defects, eliminating the energy-intensive heating step while maintaining effective defect detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If imaging techniques such as microscopy are used during manufacturing, then defect detection is possible, but the process becomes unwieldy and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex optical imaging systems with simple pneumatic testing equipment. Instead of using microscopes, stereo-microscopy, or image analysis systems that require complex optical paths and image processing, the invention uses pneumatic pressure application and measurement, which can be performed with simple, robust equipment suitable for manufacturing environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If conventional inspection methods are used, then defect detection is possible, but the manufacturing process becomes more costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional complex inspection methods with pneumatic testing, significantly simplifying the quality control process. The pneumatic method can be performed quickly without requiring high temperature equipment, imaging systems, or complex test configurations, thereby improving manufacturing efficiency while maintaining quality control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable and efficient quality control of SOFCs during manufacturing, enabling the detection of defects before stacking and reducing manufacturing costs by avoiding high-temperature processes.

Implementation Method 1

applying a pneumatic constraint to a fluid, where the fluid is in communication with the assembled portion of the SOFC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS11404710B2Assembled portion of a solid oxide fuel cell and methods for inspecting the same
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 GE VERNOVA INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US11404710B2 patent drawing
  • US11404710B2 patent drawing
  • US11404710B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intermediate solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) stage and methods for inspecting an assembled portion of an SOFC are presented. One method for inspecting an assembled portion of an SOFC includes applying a pneumatic constraint to a fluid, where the fluid is in communication with the assembled portion of the SOFC, determining a quality control parameter of the assembled portion of the SOFC in response to the pneumatic constraint, and ascertaining health of the assembled portion of the SOFC based on the quality control parameter. The assembled portion of the SOFC includes a metallic interconnect, where the metallic interconnect includes a flow field.